Cited by 210Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies

Daily fatigue in women with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia

Zautra, Alex J., Fasman, Robert, Parish, Brendt P., Davis, Mary C.·2007·Pain

Abstract

We examined between and within-person variability, affective correlates, and diagnostic differences in daily fatigue in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Two hundred and fifty-five female patients recruited from the community served as participants for this project. The patients had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of RA (n=89), OA (n=76), or FMS (n=90). Individuals completed an initial questionnaire and up to 32 daily diaries assessing illness symptoms and psychosocial variables (i.e., fatigue, pain, sleep problems, depression, and affect). The primary outcome for the current project was variability in fatigue. We examined affective, pain, and sleep correlates of fatigue, and tested whether these relations varied by diagnosis. Results indicated that FMS patients had higher overall levels of and greater daily variability in fatigue compared with the other pain groups. For all patients, fatigue correlated highly with lower positive affect (PA). Moreover, day-to-day increases in fatigue were associated with decreases in PA, particularly among FMS patients, and with increases in negative affect (NA). Daily pain was associated with increased fatigue in all groups, although OA patients showed less pain reactivity than either FMS or RA patients. These findings indicate that fatigue is a common feature of rheumatologic conditions. Nonetheless, there are important differences between RA, OA, and FM patients in both the everyday manifestations and the biopsychosocial correlates of fatigue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.004

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zautra, A. J., Fasman, R., Parish, B. P., & Davis, M. C.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zautra, Alex J.
Venue
Pain
Published
2007-03
Volume
128
Issue
1
Pages
128-135
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141535552
Cited by
210
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arthritis Foundation
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR041687, R01AR046034)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, women, within-person variability, positive affect, negative affect, pain reactivity, sleep disorders, depression, biopsychosocial model, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Arizona, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Depression, Fatigue, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Pain, Risk Factors, Sleep Wake Disorders, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review