Generalized anxiety disorder and clinical worry episodes in young women
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This article presents epidemiological data on the prevalence of DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and sub-threshold GAD (fulfilling three out of four GAD criteria) in young women together with data on co-morbidity and psychosocial functioning. The prevalence of clinically relevant worry and its predictive validity for the diagnosis of GAD were also examined. METHOD: Young women (N = 2064), aged between 18 and 25, from a representative German community sample were diagnosed with a structured clinical interview (ADIS-L, German research version). An additional interview questioned all the participants about the frequency/intensity and uncontrollability of diverse worry topics. RESULTS: Thirty-seven participants (1.8%) fulfilled the criteria of current GAD (1 week point prevalence) and 56 received a lifetime diagnosis (2.7%); a further 50 participants (2.3%) were diagnosed with sub-threshold GAD. Co-morbidity between GAD and other disorders was high for current (68%) and lifetime GAD (91%). GAD, as well as sub-threshold GAD, showed clearly reduced levels of psychosocial functioning. Whereas worries of low intensity and high controllability were ubiquitous in all subsamples, clinically defined worrying was rarely present in healthy subjects (0.89%) and of adequate predictive accuracy for GAD. CONCLUSIONS: Full GAD and sub-threshold GAD were moderately frequent in young women. Although DSM-IV worry criteria proved to be highly useful, the strictness of the complete GAD-criteria should not lead to absence of attention from subclinical generalized anxiety states in research and practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Bijl, R. V., Ravelli, A., & van Zessen, G. (1998) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050098 · Cited by 1,216 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In general population surveys, on the basis of DSM-III and DSM-III-R the lifetime prevalence was mostly estimated between 4% and 7%, the 1-year prevalence between 3% and 5%, and the point prevalence between 1"5% and 3% (Blazer et al. 1991; Wittchen et al. 1994; Offord et al. 1996; Bijl et al. 1998; Kessler et al. 1999…”
BackgroundJudd, L. L., Kessler, R. C., PauIus, M. P., Zeller, P. V., Wittchen, H. ‐., & Kunovac, J. L. (1998) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb05960.x · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Characteristics of worry in GAD patients, social phobics, and controls
Hoyer, J., Becker, E. S., & Roth, W. T. (2001) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.1021 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought
Watkins, E. R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163 · Cited by 2,421 · see citing works
The prevalence and burden of subthreshold generalized anxiety disorder: a systematic review
Haller, H., Cramer, H., Lauche, R., Gass, F., & Dobos, G. J. (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-128 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Depressive Rumination and Co-Morbidity: Evidence for Brooding as a Transdiagnostic Process
Watkins, E. R. (2009) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-009-0098-9 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Parmentier, F. B. R., García-Toro, M., García-Campayo, J., Yañez, A. M., Andrés, P., & Gili, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00506 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
NICU-based Interventions To Reduce Maternal Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms: A Meta-analysis
Mendelson, T., Cluxton-Keller, F., Vullo, G. C., Tandon, S. D., & Noazin, S. (2017) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1870 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Burstein, M., Beesdo-Baum, K., He, J.-P., & Merikangas, K. R. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713002997 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Should uncontrollable worry be removed from the definition of GAD? A test of incremental validity
Hallion, L. S., & Ruscio, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031731 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Becker, E. S., Goodwin, R., Hölting, C., Hoyer, J., & Margraf, J. (2003) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000092198.20420.fc · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationWann sind Sorgen pathologisch?
Hoyer, J., & Heidrich, S. (2009) · Verhaltenstherapie · doi:10.1159/000201938 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- HOYER, J., BECKER, E. S., & MARGRAF, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1227-1237
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2166588186
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- generalized anxiety disorder, young women, prevalence, comorbidities, psychosocial functioning, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, predictive validity, subclinical anxiety
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review