Cited by 11Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Personality and Symptom Sensitivity Predictors of Alprazolam Withdrawal in Panic Disorder

ROY-BYRNE, P., RUSSO, J., POLLACK, M., STEWART, R., BYSTRISKY, A., BELL, J., ROSENBAUM, J., CORRIGAN, M. H. +3 more·2003·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of benzodiazepine (BZ) treatment results in a well-characterized withdrawal syndrome in 40-50% of anxious patients. While numerous studies have established the role of BZ dose, treatment duration, half-life, potency, rate of withdrawal and severity of underling anxiety disorder in predicting severity of withdrawal symptoms, fewer studies have examined the role of psychological and personality factors. METHOD: In 123 panic disorder patients undergoing gradual tapered discontinuation of alprazolam in conjunction with pre-treatment with carbamazepine or placebo, the relationship between measures of 'symptom sensitivity' and 'harm avoidance', and severity of withdrawal symptoms measured as peak severity of symptoms, time before taper needed to be slowed due to symptoms, and ability to complete taper, was examined. RESULTS: After controlling for the less substantial effects of dose, treatment duration, pre-taper anxiety and panic attack frequency, measures of symptom sensitivity and harm avoidance accounted for an additional 3-6% of withdrawal variance. CONCLUSIONS: These results show an effect of symptom sensitivity and harm avoidance on BZ withdrawal symptoms, comparable to prior findings linking dependent personality characteristics to withdrawal severity. Failure to show the expected effect on ability to complete taper may be due to either the more symptomatic nature of the patients in this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291703007402

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROY-BYRNE, P., RUSSO, J., POLLACK, M., STEWART, R., BYSTRISKY, A., BELL, J., ROSENBAUM, J., CORRIGAN, M. H., STOLK, J., RUSH, A. J., & BALLENGER, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2003-04
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
511-518
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2044700137
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome, panic disorder, harm avoidance, personality traits, benzodiazepine tapering, carbamazepine, benzodiazepine dependence
MeSH terms
Adult, Alprazolam, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Dropouts, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review