The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neuropsychological functioning in stimulant-naive boys with hyperkinetic disorder
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although children with hyperkinetic disorder and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) show disordered executive neuropsychological functioning, the nature of these changes remains controversial. Additionally, impairments in non-executive neuropsychological functioning have been relatively unexplored. Here, the authors describe the neuropsychological functioning of a sample of stimulant drug-naive boys with hyperkinetic disorder on a battery of neuropsychological tasks sensitive to impairments of both executive and non-executive functions. METHOD: Seventy-five stimulant drug-naive boys meeting diagnostic criteria for ICD-10 hyperkinetic disorder were compared with 70 healthy developing controls matched for age but not IQ on computerized tests of neuropsychological functioning from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and a Go/No-Go inhibition task. RESULTS: Boys with hyperkinetic disorder exhibited impairments on tasks with a prominent executive component--working memory, planning, strategy formation, attentional set-shifting and on a reaction time task. However, they were also impaired on tasks without prominent executive components--pattern and spatial recognition, spatial span, delayed matching to sample and paired associates learning. Contrary to predictions, no impairment was observed on the Go/No-Go inhibition task. CONCLUSIONS: Medication-naive boys with hyperkinetic disorder displayed a broad range of neuropsychological impairments. Deficits were demonstrated on tasks with and without prominent executive components. Impairments were not confined to tasks dependent upon frontostriatal functioning, cannot wholly be explained by deficits in inhibitory control, nor can they be attributed to intelligence or previous exposure to stimulant medication.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Children and adults suffering from ADHD are known to display long-term memory deficits [9,45] which are often ascribed to deviant encoding rather than to problems during consolidation or retrieval [6].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction
Castellanos, F. X., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Milham, M. P., & Tannock, R. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.011 · Cited by 1,170
Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., & Castellanos, F. X. (2007) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.005 · Cited by 890
“, 2004) and non-executive tasks (Rhodes et al., 2005).”
Attention‐Deficit‐Hyperactivity Disorder: An Update
Dopheide, J. A., & Pliszka, S. R. (2009) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1592/phco.29.6.656 · Cited by 653
“A recent large study showed no difference in the number of impulsive “no-go” errors between children with ADHD and controls on a “go–nogo” task.(40) On any given measure of executive function, only 16–50% of children with ADHD are found to be impaired.”
BackgroundCorbett, B. A., Constantine, L. J., Hendren, R., Rocke, D., & Ozonoff, S. (2009) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.02.005 · Cited by 584
“, (Kempton et al., 1999; Rhodes et al., 2005)), planning (e.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCoghill, D., & Sonuga‐Barke, E. J. S. (2012) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02511.x · Cited by 355
“First, ADHD is a pathophysiologically heterogeneous condition with different patients being affected to different degrees by different types of underlying deficits (Rhodes, Riby, Matthews, & Coghill, 2011b; Rhodes et al., 2005; Sonuga-Barke, 2002, 2005; Sonuga-Barke & Halperin, 2010).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- RHODES, S. M., COGHILL, D. R., & MATTHEWS, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1109-1120
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2063756651
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Tenovus
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- hyperkinetic disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, executive function, neuropsychological deficits, boys, working memory, planning, strategy formulation, set-shifting, spatial recognition, paired-associate learning, inhibitory control, CANTAB
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review