Cited by 68Psychedelics and Drug StudiesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Ecstasy use and higher-level cognitive functions: weak effects of ecstasy after control for potential confounds

Bedi, G., Redman, J.·2008·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Although there have been several reports linking ecstasy use with lowered cognitive function, much previous research suffers from substantial methodological limitations. The present study aimed to examine associations between ecstasy use and higher-level cognitive functions, using a larger sample size than most previous research and better controlling for a range of potential confounds. Method: A cross-sectional cohort design assessed 45 currently abstinent ecstasy polydrug users (EP), 48 cannabis polydrug users (CP) and 40 legal drug users (LD). Standardized neuropsychological tests were used to measure attention, verbal, visual and working memory and executive function. Prospective memory function was also assessed. Results: It was not possible to discriminate between groups on the basis of the cognitive functions assessed. Regression analyses showed an inverse association between lifetime dose of ecstasy and verbal memory performance. A combination of drug-use variables, including measures of ecstasy use, contributed to prediction of attention/working memory. However, individual associations were small, explaining 1–6% of variance in cognitive scores. Conclusions: Although the results suggest that heavy use of ecstasy is associated with some lowering of higher-level cognitive functions, they do not indicate a clinical picture of substantial cognitive dysfunction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291708002730

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This variability may have affected results, as heavy ecstasy use may cause long-term alterations to serotonergic neurotransmission.

    “This may have affected results, as it is possible that heavy ecstasy use causes long-term alterations to serotonergic neurotransmission (McCann et al. 2000; see also Bedi et al., 2008 for discussion of methodological issues).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bedi, G., & Redman, J.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bedi, G.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2008-01-29
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
1319-1330
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2091529825
Cited by
68
References
60
Citations by year
2023: 19 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
ecstasy, MDMA, cognitive function, polydrug use, cannabis, verbal memory, working memory, attention, executive function, prospective memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attention, Cannabis, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Students, Verbal Behavior, Cohort Studies, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review