Cited by 1,149Cognitive Functions and MemoryHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome

Barbara Ann Wilson, Jonathan J. Evans, Nick Alderman, Paul W. Burgess, Hazel Emslie·2004·Methodology Of Frontal And Executive Function

Abstract

Assessments are carried out in order to answer questions. Consequently, the nature of the question determines the assessment procedure. So we would use different tests and procedures for testing out a theoretical model than we would for trying to predict the likelihood of successful return to work for a brain-injured patient. An example of the former is the work of Baddeley, Logie, Bressi, Della Sala, and Spinnler (1986), who were trying to support or refute their hypothesis that patients with Alzheimer’s disease had a deficit in the central executive component of the working memory model (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974). An example of the latter is Shallice and Burgess’s (1991) six elements test which requires participants to plan and organise their activity over a 15-minute period while following certain rules. Mayes (1986) discusses the different concerns of researchers and clinicians with regard to memory assessments but his views are equally relevant to assessments of executive functioning. When thinking about frontal lobe or executive functioning clinicians are likely to be concerned with answering such questions as: 1. Does this person have cognitive impairments that are typically associated with the Dysexecutive syndrome (DES)?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203344187-15

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, B. A., Evans, J. J., Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., & Emslie, H.
Venue
Methodology Of Frontal And Executive Function
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2004-08-02
Pages
240-251
OpenAlex
W2252383517
Cited by
1,149
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 64
FWCI
162.70
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
dysexecutive syndrome, executive function, frontal lobe dysfunction, cognitive assessment, working memory, central executive, brain injury, return to work, memory assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review