The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence and outcomes of bulimia nervosa: a nationwide population-based study
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the epidemiology of bulimia nervosa outside clinical settings. We report the incidence, prevalence and outcomes of bulimia nervosa using for the first time a nationwide study design. Method: To assess the incidence and natural course and outcomes of DSM-IV bulimia nervosa among women from the general population, women (n=2881) from the 1975–79 birth cohorts of Finnish twins were screened for lifetime eating disorders using a two-stage procedure consisting of a questionnaire screen and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Clinical recovery was defined as 1-year abstinence from bingeing and purging combined with a body mass index (BMI) ⩾19 kg/m 2. Results: The lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV bulimia nervosa was 2.3%; 76% of the women suffered from its purging subtype and 24% from the non-purging subtype. The incidence rate of bulimia nervosa was 300/100000 person-years at the peak age of incidence, 16–20 years, and 150/100000 at 10–24 years. The 5-year clinical recovery rate was 55.0%. Less than a third of the cases had been detected by health-care professionals; detection did not influence outcome. After clinical recovery from bulimia nervosa, the mean levels of residual psychological symptoms gradually decreased over time but many women continued to experience significantly more body image problems and psychosomatic symptoms than never-ill women. Conclusions: Few women with bulimia nervosa are recognized in health-care settings. Symptoms of bulimia are relatively long-standing, and recovery is gradual. Many clinically recovered women experience residual psychological symptoms after attaining abstinence from bingeing and purging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Hudson, J. I., Hiripi, E., Pope, H. G., & Kessler, R. C. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040 · Cited by 4,973
A Note on Robust Variance Estimation for Cluster‐Correlated Data
Williams, R. L. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00645.x · Cited by 2,501 · cited 1×
“To account for clustered sampling within the twin pair, p values and CIs were adjusted using standard procedures for survey data (Williams, 2000).”
MethodOutcomes of eating disorders: a systematic review of the literature
Berkman, N. D., Lohr, K. N., & Bulik, C. M. (2007) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20369 · Cited by 595 · cited 1×
“Long-term follow-up studies of bulimia nervosa also primarily reflected clinical case series or catchment area studies (Keel & Mitchell, 1997 ; Fairburn et al. 2000 ; Berkman et al. 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEpidemiology and course of anorexia nervosa in the community
Keski-Rahkonen, A., Hoek, H. W., Susser, E. S., Linna, M. S., Sihvola, E., Raevuori, A., Bulik, C. M., Kaprio, J., & Rissanen, A. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06081388 · Cited by 504
Self-citationBecker, A. E., Grinspoon, S. K., Klibanski, A., & Herzog, D. B. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199904083401407 · Cited by 414
Eating disorders: Progress and problems
Walsh, B. T., & Devlin, M. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5368.1387 · Cited by 197
Perfectionism in anorexia nervosa: A 6–24 month follow-up study
Sutandar‐Pinnock, K., Blake Woodside, D., Carter, J. C., Olmsted, M. P., & Kaplan, A. S. (2003) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.10127 · Cited by 146 · cited 2×
“state-dependent) than other measures of perfectionism (Sutandar-Pinnock et al. 2003).”
Result
Cited by
Epidemiology of Eating Disorders: Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality Rates
Smink, F. R. E., van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2012) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-012-0282-y · Cited by 1,978
Self-citationKessler, R. C., Berglund, P. A., Chiu, W. T., Deitz, A. C., Hudson, J. I., Shahly, V., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Benjet, C., et al. (2013) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.020 · Cited by 1,338
Epidemiology, course, and outcome of eating disorders
Smink, F. R. E., van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2013) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e328365a24f · Cited by 507
Self-citationPrevalence and severity of DSM‐5 eating disorders in a community cohort of adolescents
Smink, F. R. E., van Hoeken, D., Oldehinkel, A. J., & Hoek, H. W. (2014) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22316 · Cited by 415
Self-citationBardone-Cone, A. M., Harney, M. B., Maldonado, C. R., Lawson, M. A., Robinson, D. P., Smith, R., & Tosh, A. (2010) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.001 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Keski-Rahkonen, A., Hoek, H. W., Linna, M. S., Raevuori, A., Sihvola, E., Bulik, C. M., Rissanen, A., & Kaprio, J.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-09-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 823-831
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2146593049
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and outcomes of bulimia nervosa: a nationwide population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291708003942
- The paper
- Keski-Rahkonen, A., Hoek, H. W., Linna, M. S., Raevuori, A., Sihvola, E., Bulik, C. M., Rissanen, A., & Kaprio, J. (2009). Incidence and outcomes of bulimia nervosa: a nationwide population-based study. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291708003942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.