Cited by 99Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingHealth, Medicine and Society

Mental capacity, diagnosis and insight in psychiatric in-patients: A cross-sectional study

Open access
Owen, G. S., David, A. S., Richardson, G., Szmukler, G., Hayward, P., Hotopf, M.·2009·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental capacity is now a core part of UK mental health law and clinicians will increasingly be expected to assess it. Because it is a legal concept there is a need to clarify associations with variables that clinicians are more familiar with, especially insight. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study we recruited consecutive psychiatric admissions to the Maudsley Hospital, London. We carried out structured assessments of decision making using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), resulting in a clinical judgement about capacity status. We analysed associations with a range of sociodemographic and clinical variables, including insight score on the Expanded Schedule for the Assessment of Insight (SAI-E). The same variables were compared in an analysis stratified according to diagnostic group: psychotic disorders/bipolar affective disorder (BPAD)/non-psychotic disorders. RESULTS: Psychotic disorders and manic episodes of BPAD are most strongly associated with incapacity. In such patients, insight is the best discriminator of capacity status. In patients with non-psychotic disorders, insight is less strongly associated with capacity; in this group depressed mood discriminates capacity status whereas it does not in psychotic disorders. Cognitive performance does not discriminate capacity status in patients with psychotic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Mental capacity has complex relationships with psychopathological variables, and these relationships are different according to diagnostic group. Insight is the best discriminator of capacity status in psychotic disorders and BPAD but not in non-psychotic disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291708004637

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another study found that being female predicted incapacity in a bivariate analysis, which became non-significant when adjusting for alcohol or substance dependence.

    “Another study found that being female predicted incapacity in a bivariate analysis (OR = 0.19, 95% CI [1.07 -3.56]), which became nonsignificant when adjusting for alcohol or substance dependence (G.Owen et al., 2009).”

    From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as G.Owen et al., 2009

    The Sociodemographic and basic clinical variables section reports an unadjusted association between female sex and incapacity that disappears after adjustment for alcohol or substance dependence. The citing sentence gives the unadjusted odds ratio as 0.19, but the paper reports 1.96 (95% CI 1.07–3.56). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In patients with a diagnosis of depression, poor insight was a poor predictor of incapacity and regaining capacity was less associated with change in insight.

    “although in patients with a diagnosis of depression poor insight was a poor predictor of incapacity (G. S. Owen et al., 2008) and regaining capacity was less associated with change in insight (G.Owen et al., 2009).”

    From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as G.Owen et al., 2009

    The Insight section reports that poor insight is less strongly associated with incapacity in non-psychotic disorders than in psychotic disorders or BPAD, and that it does not map cleanly onto capacity status in the non-psychotic group. That group includes unipolar depression, but the paper does not report this result for patients with depression alone. The separate statement about regaining capacity is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Depression was also associated with incapacity.

    “and depression (G.Owen et al., 2009;G. S. Owen et al., 2008G. S. Owen et al., , 2011;;Tor et al., 2020).”

    From Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as G.Owen et al., 2009

    The Conclusions state that depression is associated with incapacity in non-psychotic disorders, a group dominated by unipolar depression. The claim omits that diagnostic qualifier: the Sociodemographic and basic clinical variables section reports an association between a depression diagnosis and retaining capacity overall. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across inpatients, poor insight was a consistent and strong predictor of incapacity.

    “Across inpatients, poor insight was also a consistent and strong predictor of incapacity (G.Owen et al., 2009;G. S. Owen et al., 2011;Seo et al., 2011;Skipworth et al., 2013;Spencer et al., 2018)”
  • Hallucinations were correlated with capacity in non-psychotic disorders, but not in psychotic disorders.

    “Hallucinations were correlated with capacity in non-psychotic disorders (G.Owen et al., 2009), but not in psychotic disorders (Skipworth et al., 2013;Spencer et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beck-Sandler A Is insight meaningful? Journal of Mental Health 1998 7 25 34

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owen, G. S., David, A. S., Richardson, G., Szmukler, G., Hayward, P., & Hotopf, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Owen, G. S.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2008-10-22
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
1389-1398
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2140241730
Cited by
99
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (MAUBRC-2012-1, NF-SI-0507-10088)
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
decision-making capacity, insight, psychiatric inpatients, psychosis, bipolar disorder, manic episodes, depressive mood, cognitive performance, decision-making, mental health law, capacity assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Awareness, Mental Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Depressive Disorder, Expert Testimony, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Mental Competency, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review