Cited by 33Crime Patterns and InterventionsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

A Swedish population-based study of the mechanisms of parent–offspring transmission of criminal behavior

Kendler, K. S., Ohlsson, H., Morris, N. A., Sundquist, J., Sundquist, K.·2015·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background.: While children of parents with criminal behavior (CB) are at increased risk for CB, we have limited knowledge about the causes of this cross-generational transmission. Method.: We examined intergenerational continuity in CB in the Swedish population ascertained from the national conviction registers in three family types: intact (n= 21 11 074), ‘not-lived-with’ (n= 16 53 15 where biological parents never lived with their offspring) and ‘step’ (n= 1 24 800 offspring) which reflected, respectively, the effects of genes + rearing, genes only and rearing only. We also examined three criminal conviction subtypes: violent CB (VCB), property CB (PCB) and white-collar CB (WCCB). Results.: Combined across mothers and fathers, the hazard ratio (HR) for CB in offspring given parental CB was 1.95 in intact, 1.56 in ‘not-lived-with’ and 1.28 in stepfamilies. In all three family types, all forms of CB in parents (VCB, PCB and WCCB) significantly predicted risk for all forms of CB in offspring. However, VCB in offspring was most strongly predicted by VCB in parents in intact, not-lived-with and stepfamilies. In intact families only, some specific parent–offspring transmission was also seen for WCCB. Conclusions.: Both genetic and environmental factors contribute substantially to parent–offspring resemblance for CB. With respect to criminal subtypes, much of parent–offspring transmission appears to be non-specific. However, specific genetic and environmental risk factors for VCB are transmitted across generations. A limitation of these analyses is that CB was assessed only via official criminal convictions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291714002268

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendler, K. S., Ohlsson, H., Morris, N. A., Sundquist, J., & Sundquist, K.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Kendler, K. S.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2014-09-17
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1093-1102
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2165777186
Cited by
33
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
parent-offspring resemblance, violent crime, property crime, white-collar crime, stepfamilies, genetic and environmental risk factors, criminal conviction, family structure
MeSH terms
Criminal Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Registries, Social Environment, Sweden, Proportional Hazards Models, Information Storage and Retrieval, Intergenerational Relations, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review