Cited by 36Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeSchizophrenia research and treatment

Cost-effectiveness of the Mental Health and Development model for schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorders in rural Kenya

Open access
de Menil, V., Knapp, M., McDaid, D., Raja, S., Kingori, J., Waruguru, M., Wood, S. K., Mannarath, S. +1 more·2015·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment gap for serious mental disorders across low-income countries is estimated to be 89%. The model for Mental Health and Development (MHD) offers community-based care for people with mental disorders in 11 low- and middle-income countries. METHOD: In Kenya, using a pre-post design, 117 consecutively enrolled participants with schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar disorders were followed-up at 10 and 20 months. Comparison outcomes were drawn from the literature. Costs were analysed from societal and health system perspectives. RESULTS: From the societal perspective, MHD cost Int$ 594 per person in the first year and Int$ 876 over 2 years. The cost per healthy day gained was Int$ 7.96 in the first year and Int$ 1.03 over 2 years - less than the agricultural minimum wage. The cost per disability-adjusted life year averted over 2 years was Int$ 13.1 and Int$ 727 from the societal and health system perspectives, respectively, on par with antiretrovirals for HIV. CONCLUSIONS: MHD achieved increasing returns over time. The model appears cost-effective and equitable, especially over 2 years. Its affordability relies on multi-sectoral participation nationally and internationally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291715000719

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BasicNeeds model, a social intervention that integrates employment with the care and treatment of mental disorders, is cost effective and accessible to community members particularly vulnerable due to their symptoms and poverty.

    “The BasicNeeds model, a social intervention that integrates employment with the care and treatment of mental disorders, is cost effective and accessible to community members particularly vulnerable due to their symptoms and poverty 47 70 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Health Organization (ed.) 2010. Measuring HealthandDisability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule WHODAS 2.0, Geneva.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Menil, V., Knapp, M., McDaid, D., Raja, S., Kingori, J., Waruguru, M., Wood, S. K., Mannarath, S., & Lund, C.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2015-05-21
Volume
45
Issue
13
Pages
2747-2756
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2130436785
Cited by
36
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • LSE Research Online Documents on Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Department for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, community mental health services, cost-effectiveness, rural Kenya, treatment gap, disability-adjusted life years, health system costs, social costs, mental health equity
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Kenya, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Schizophrenia, Health Care Costs, Models, Economic, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review