Cited by 10Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychiatric care and mental health services

Scaling-up a New Socio-Mental Health Service Model in Iran to Reduce Burden of Neuropsychiatric Disorders: An Economic Evaluation Study

Open access
Hosseini Jebeli, Seyede Sedighe, Rezapour, Aziz, Hajebi, Ahmad, Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar, Damari, Behzad·2021·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The integration of core packages of mental health care into routine primary health care has been introduced as an effective way to achieve universal health coverage in mental health care. Based on the transition of mental health care in Iran, from introducing basic mental health care in PHC to the experience of community-based mental health centers for urban areas, a new socio-mental health service model has been so far proposed. This study aimed to estimate the impact of scaling-up the new socio-mental health model at the national level as well as its associated costs. METHODS: This study was a cost-consequence analysis following One Health Tool methodology. The data required for the study were collected in the first quarter of the year 2020 with a time horizon from 2020 to 2030. The selected metric for summarizing health effects is healthy life years gained. Resources used in terms of drug and supply, staff salaries and outpatient visits were documented and associated costs were subsequently estimated in order to estimate the average cost of each intervention per case. RESULTS: The health impacts are calculated in terms of healthy life years gained for 2020-2030, after adjusting the prevalence and incidence rates for each disorder. In total, 1,702,755 healthy life years were expected to be gained. Considering total 1,363,581,654 US dollars cost in base case scenario, each healthy life years gained will cost around 801 US dollars. Based on the WHO criteria for cost-effectiveness threshold, all of the values ranged from 724 to 1119 US dollars obtained through eight different scenarios were considered as cost-effective given the GDP per capita of 5550 US dollars for Iran in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health budget in Iran equals to about three percent of total health expenditure while the mental health cost per capita is estimated to be 1.73 US dollar which are relatively low considering the share of the MNS disorders in the national burden of diseases. The results of current study showing the cost of 16.4 US dollar per capita for scaling up this comprehensive mental health service model can convince high-level policy-makers to increase the share of mental health budget accordingly. The present study demonstrated that the cost in this new socio-mental services model is not substantial compared with GDP per capita of Iran.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13033-021-00468-w

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One factor that may explain the predominance of Iranian studies is that the Iranian Ministry of Health supports national mental health programs and research in accordance with the WHO's Mental Health Gap Action Program.

    “One of the factors that may explain this predominance is that the Iranian Ministry of Health supports national mental health programs and research in accordance with the WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Program, which prioritizes the treatment of disorders such as depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder [63].”

    From Psychological Treatments for Alexithymia: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Research planning section says Iranian Ministry of Health planners selected depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder for this program and that its interventions are recommended by WHO’s mhGAP. The Conclusion describes ministry collaboration on a national scale-up plan. Neither section establishes that the ministry supports mental health research in accordance with mhGAP or that such support explains the predominance of Iranian studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]World Health Organization mhGAP: mental health gap action programme: scaling up care for mental, neurological and substance use disorders 2008 Geneva World Health Organization 26290926

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosseini Jebeli, S. S., Rezapour, A., Hajebi, A., Moradi-Lakeh, M., & Damari, B.
Affiliations
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Rezapour, Aziz
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2021-05-20
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
47-47
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121415434
Cited by
10
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS/SHMIS/1397-2-37-12423.)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
scaling up mental health services, neuropsychiatric disorders, cost-effectiveness, primary care integration, mental health funding, Iran

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review