Cited by 21Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Empirically determined severity levels for binge-eating disorder outperform existing severity classification schemes

Forrest, Lauren N., Jacobucci, Ross C., Grilo, Carlos M.·2022·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Eating-disorder severity indicators should theoretically index symptom intensity, impairment, and level of needed treatment. Two severity indicators for binge-eating disorder (BED) have been proposed (categories of binge-eating frequency and shape/weight overvaluation) but have mixed empirical support including modest clinical utility. This project uses structural equation model (SEM) trees – a form of exploratory data mining – to empirically determine the precise levels of binge-eating frequency and/or shape/weight overvaluation that most significantly differentiate BED severities. Methods: Participants were 788 adults with BED enrolled in BED treatment studies. Participants completed interviews and self-report measures assessing eating-disorder and comorbid symptoms. SEM Tree analyses were performed by specifying an outcome model of BED severity and then recursively partitioning the outcome model into subgroups. Subgroups were split based on empirically determined values of binge-eating frequency and/or shape/weight overvaluation. SEM Forests also quantified which variable contributed more improvement in model fit. Results: SEM Tree analyses yielded five subgroups, presented in ascending order of severity: overvaluation <1.25, overvaluation = 1.25–2.74, overvaluation = 2.75–4.24, overvaluation ⩾4.25 with weekly binge-eating frequency <4.875, and overvaluation ⩾4.25 with weekly binge-eating frequency ⩾4.875. SEM Forest analyses revealed that splits that occurred on shape/weight overvaluation resulted in much more improvement in model fit than splits that occurred on binge-eating frequency. Conclusions: Shape/weight overvaluation differentiated BED severity more strongly than binge-eating frequency. Findings indicate a nuanced potential BED severity indicator scheme, based on a combination of cognitive and behavioral eating-disorder symptoms. These results inform BED classification and may allow for the provision of more specific and need-matched treatment formulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291720002287

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. First, M. B. , Spitzer, R. L. , Gibbon, M. , & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders – patient edition (SCID-I/P, version 2.0). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  2. 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  3. 2004, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  4. Beck, 1987, Manual for the beck depression inventory

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forrest, L. N., Jacobucci, R. C., & Grilo, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Forrest, Lauren N.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2020-06-30
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
685-695
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W3039356138
Cited by
21
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK049587, R01DK114075, R01DK112771)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
binge eating disorder, eating disorder severity, severity classification, binge eating frequency, exploratory data mining, treatment matching
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Image, Body Weight, Humans, Self Concept, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review