Cited by 14COVID-19 and Mental HealthCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A daily diary study into the effects on mental health of COVID-19 pandemic-related behaviors

Open access
Shaw, Philip, Blizzard, Sam, Shastri, Gauri, Kundzicz, Paul, Curtis, Brenda, Ungar, Lyle, Koehly, Laura·2021·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Recommendations for promoting mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic include maintaining social contact, through virtual rather than physical contact, moderating substance/alcohol use, and limiting news and media exposure. We seek to understand if these pandemic-related behaviors impact subsequent mental health. Methods: Daily online survey data were collected on adults during May/June 2020. Measures were of daily physical and virtual (online) contact with others; substance and media use; and indices of psychological striving, struggling and COVID-related worry. Using random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis, dynamic within-person cross-lagged effects were separated from more static individual differences. Results: In total, 1148 participants completed daily surveys [657 (57.2%) females, 484 (42.1%) males; mean age 40.6 ( s.d. 12.4) years]. Daily increases in news consumed increased COVID-related worrying the next day [cross-lagged estimate = 0.034 (95% CI 0.018–0.049), FDR-adjusted p = 0.00005] and vice versa [0.03 (0.012–0.048), FDR-adjusted p = 0.0017]. Increased media consumption also exacerbated subsequent psychological struggling [0.064 (0.03–0.098), FDR-adjusted p = 0.0005]. There were no significant cross-lagged effects of daily changes in social distancing or virtual contact on later mental health. Conclusions: We delineate a cycle wherein a daily increase in media consumption results in a subsequent increase in COVID-related worries, which in turn increases daily media consumption. Moreover, the adverse impact of news extended to broader measures of psychological struggling. A similar dynamic did not unfold between the daily amount of physical or virtual contact and subsequent mental health. Findings are consistent with current recommendations to moderate news and media consumption in order to promote mental health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291721001896

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Worry about the COVID-19 pandemic predicted increased consumption of pandemic-related media and doomscrolling, which in turn led to further increases in negative emotions and pandemic-related worry.

    “Several studies found that worry about the pandemic predicted increased consumption of pandemic-related media and doomscrolling, which in turn led to further increases in negative emotions and pandemic-related worry [74,149-151].”

    From Impact of Media-Induced Uncertainty on Mental Health: Narrative-Based Perspective. (2025) · cites this paper as [151]

    The Results report that COVID-related worry predicted greater news/media consumption the next day, while greater consumption predicted subsequent worry and psychological struggling. The Discussion describes this as a vicious cycle. The paper does not identify or measure doomscrolling specifically, so that part of the claim is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Daily survey studies found a bidirectional relationship: increased exposure to COVID-19 news on one day increased COVID-19 worries the next day, and higher worries on one day predicted higher media exposure the next day.

    “According to daily survey studies, increased exposure to COVID-19 news on one day increased COVID-19 worries the next day, and higher worries on one day predicted higher media exposure the next day [150,151].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, P., Blizzard, S., Shastri, G., Kundzicz, P., Curtis, B., Ungar, L., & Koehly, L.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Philip
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2021-07-12
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W3181127484
Cited by
14
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute
  • Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mental health, news consumption, media exposure, social distancing, virtual contact, substance use, alcohol consumption, within-person dynamics
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review