The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE–RIFT): a brief measure of functional impairment
Abstract
Background. The literature documents that functional impairment is associated with affective disorders. Nevertheless, the choice among thorough, yet brief, well-validated assessments of functional impairment is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a brief scale of functional impairment, the Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE–RIFT). Method. The study sample included subjects who presented with major depressive disorder at intake into the NIMH Collaborative Depression Study (CDS). The LIFE–RIFT is composed of items that are included in the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE). The reliability and validity were examined using data from LIFE–RIFT assessments conducted at four points in time: 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after intake into the CDS. Results. Cross-sectional one factor models accounted for the covariance structure among the four scale items. A longitudinal factor model, with an invariant factor structure over time, also fitted the data well and indicated that the scale items are measures of one construct, namely functional impairment. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was supported with alpha coefficients ranging from 0·81 to 0·83. The inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0·94. Mixed-effect linear regression models showed that those in episode were significantly more impaired than those in recovery. Furthermore, in analyses of predictive validity, impairment was positively associated with subsequent recurrence and negatively associated with subsequent recovery. Conclusions. This psychometric evaluation provides empirical support for the reliability and validity of the LIFE–RIFT, a brief measure of functional impairment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982 · cited 4×
“The GAS is scored such that a high score represents better functioning and less severe symptomatology.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationAssessment of social adjustment by patient self report.
Weissman, M. M. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010 · Cited by 1,782
Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2010) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000289026 · Cited by 1,295
Assessing Psychiatric Impairment in Primary Care with the Sheehan Disability Scale
Leon, A. C., Olfson, M., Portera, L., Farber, L., & Sheehan, D. V. (1997) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.2190/t8em-c8yh-373n-1uwd · Cited by 987
Self-citationService utilization and social morbidity associated with depressive symptoms in the community
Johnson, J. (1992) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480110054033 · Cited by 726
Social adjustment by self-report in a community sample and in psychiatric outpatients
WEISSMAN, M. M., PRUSOFF, B. A., THOMPSON, W. D., HARDING, P. S., & MYERS, J. K. (1978) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-197805000-00002 · Cited by 537 · cited 2×
“For instance, the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS), which has both clinician (Weissman & Bothwell, 1976) and self-rated (Weissman et al. 1978) versions, has over 50 items.”
BackgroundMethodMIXOR: a computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis
Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. D. (1996) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/0169-2607(96)01720-8 · Cited by 408
Cited by
Perlis, R. H., Miyahara, S., Marangell, L. B., Wisniewski, S. R., Ostacher, M., DelBello, M. P., Bowden, C. L., Sachs, G. S., & Nierenberg, A. A. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.01.022 · Cited by 852
Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., Schettler, P. J., Endicott, J., Leon, A. C., Solomon, D. A., Coryell, W., Maser, J. D., & Keller, M. B. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1322 · Cited by 577
Self-citationImpact of obsessive-compulsive disorder on quality of life
Eisen, J. L., Mancebo, M. A., Pinto, A., Coles, M. E., Pagano, M. E., Stout, R., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2006) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.11.006 · Cited by 435
Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice.
Ruggero, C. J., Kotov, R., Hopwood, C. J., First, M., Clark, L. A., Skodol, A. E., Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Patrick, C. J., Bach, B., Cicero, D. C., et al. (2019) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000452 · Cited by 333
Judd, L. L., Schettler, P. J., Solomon, D. A., Maser, J. D., Coryell, W., Endicott, J., & Akiskal, H. S. (2008) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.06.014 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LEON, A. C., SOLOMON, D. A., MUELLER, T. I., TURVEY, C. L., ENDICOTT, J., & KELLER, M. B.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 869-878
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2161297280
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE–RIFT): a brief measure of functional impairment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291799008570
- The paper
- LEON, A. C., SOLOMON, D. A., MUELLER, T. I., TURVEY, C. L., ENDICOTT, J., & KELLER, M. B. (1999). The Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE–RIFT): a brief measure of functional impairment. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291799008570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.