Key role of the REC lobe during CRISPR–Cas9 activation by ‘sensing’, ‘regulating’, and ‘locking’ the catalytic HNH domain
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the conformational dynamics of CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)-Cas9 is of the utmost importance for improving its genome editing capability. Here, molecular dynamics simulations performed using Anton-2 - a specialized supercomputer capturing micro-to-millisecond biophysical events in real time and at atomic-level resolution - reveal the activation process of the endonuclease Cas9 toward DNA cleavage. Over the unbiased simulation, we observe that the spontaneous approach of the catalytic domain HNH to the DNA cleavage site is accompanied by a remarkable structural remodeling of the recognition (REC) lobe, which exerts a key role for DNA cleavage. Specifically, the significant conformational changes and the collective conformational dynamics of the REC lobe indicate a mechanism by which the REC1-3 regions 'sense' nucleic acids, 'regulate' the HNH conformational transition, and ultimately 'lock' the HNH domain at the cleavage site, contributing to its catalytic competence. By integrating additional independent simulations and existing experimental data, we provide a solid validation of the activated HNH conformation, which had been so far poorly characterized, and we deliver a comprehensive understanding of the role of REC1-3 in the activation process. Considering the importance of the REC lobe in the specificity of Cas9, this study poses the basis for fully understanding how the REC components control the cleavage of off-target sequences, laying the foundation for future engineering efforts toward improved genome editing.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PAM binding to CRISPR-Cas9 plays a key role in triggering the interdependent conformational dynamics of HNH and RuvC, likely enabling the concerted cleavage of the DNA strands.
“This led the authors to conclude that PAM binding to CRISPR-Cas9 plays a key role in triggering the interdependent conformational dynamics of HNH and RuvC, likely enabling the concerted cleavage of the DNA strands (Palermo et al., 2018).”
From Allostery in Its Many Disguises: From Theory to Applications (2019) · cites this paper as Palermo et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J., Impey, R., & Klein, M. (1983) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.445869 · Cited by 38,335 · see citing works
Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A., & Haak, J. R. (1984) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.448118 · Cited by 30,626 · see citing works
Ryckaert, J., Ciccotti, G., & Berendsen, H. (1977) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · Cited by 19,525 · see citing works
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116 · see citing works
Self-citationThe new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258096 · Cited by 7,062 · see citing works
Self-citationGROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis
Lindahl, E. R., Hess, B., & van der Spoel, D. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s008940100045 · Cited by 6,953 · see citing works
Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics
Tuckerman, M. E., Berne, B. J., & Martyna, G. J. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.463137 · Cited by 3,566 · see citing works
Essential dynamics of proteins
Amadei, A., Linssen, A. B. M., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1993) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340170408 · Cited by 3,487 · see citing works
Salomón–Ferrer, R., Götz, A. W., Poole, D., LeGrand, S., & Walker, R. C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400314y · Cited by 3,373 · see citing works
High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects
Kleinstiver, B. P., Pattanayak, V., Prew, M. S., Tsai, S. Q., Nguyen, N. T., Zheng, Z., & Joung, J. K. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16526 · Cited by 2,673 · see citing works
Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity
Slaymaker, I. M., Gao, L., Zetsche, B., Scott, D. A., Yan, W. X., & Zhang, F. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad5227 · Cited by 2,414 · see citing works
Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA
Nishimasu, H., Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Konermann, S., Shehata, S. I., Dohmae, N., Ishitani, R., Zhang, F., & Nureki, O. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001 · Cited by 2,306 · see citing works
Refinement of the AMBER Force Field for Nucleic Acids: Improving the Description of α/γ Conformers
Pérez, A., Marchán, I., Svozil, D., Šponer, J., Cheatham, T. E., Laughton, C. A., & Orozco, M. (2007) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.097782 · Cited by 2,171 · see citing works
CRISPR–Cas9 Structures and Mechanisms
Jiang, F., & Doudna, J. A. (2017) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010822 · Cited by 2,029 · see citing works
Self-citationIon-water interaction potentials derived from free energy perturbation simulations
Åqvist, J. (1990) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100384a009 · Cited by 1,675 · see citing works
Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease
Anders, C., Niewoehner, O., Duerst, A., & Jínek, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13579 · Cited by 1,319 · see citing works
Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation
Jinek, M., Jiang, F., Taylor, D. W., Sternberg, S. H., Kaya, E., Ma, E., Anders, C., Hauer, M., Zhou, K., Lin, S., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247997 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Self-citationZgarbová, M., Otyepka, M., Šponer, J., Mládek, A., Banáš, P., Cheatham, T. E., & Jurečka, P. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200162x · Cited by 1,173 · see citing works
Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy
Chen, J. S., Dagdas, Y. S., Kleinstiver, B. P., Welch, M. M., Sousa, A. A., Harrington, L. B., Sternberg, S. H., Joung, J. K., Yildiz, A., & Doudna, J. A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24268 · Cited by 1,168 · see citing works
Self-citationGrand, S. L., Götz, A. W., & Walker, R. C. (2012) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.022 · Cited by 1,156 · see citing works
Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics: Unconstrained Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculation
Miao, Y., Feher, V. A., & McCammon, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00436 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Self-citationConformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9
Sternberg, S. H., LaFrance, B., Kaplan, M., & Doudna, J. A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15544 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Self-citationStructures of a CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex primed for DNA cleavage
Jiang, F., Taylor, D. W., Chen, J. S., Kornfeld, J. E., Zhou, K., Thompson, A. J., Nogales, E., & Doudna, J. A. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8282 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Self-citationRNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview
Šponer, J., Bussi, G., Krepl, M., Banáš, P., Bottaro, S., Cunha, R. A., Gil-Ley, A., Pinamonti, G., Poblete, S., Jurečka, P., et al. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00427 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Shaw, D. E., Grossman, J. P., Bank, J. A., Batson, B., Butts, J. A., Chao, J. C., Deneroff, M. M., Dror, R., Even, A., Fenton, C. H., et al. (2014) · International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis · doi:10.1109/sc.2014.9 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
A Cas9–guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition
Jiang, F., Zhou, K., Ma, L., Gressel, S., & Doudna, J. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1452 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Self-citationA highly specific SpCas9 variant is identified by in vivo screening in yeast
Casini, A., Olivieri, M., Petris, G., Montagna, C., Reginato, G., Maule, G., Lorenzin, F., Prandi, D., Romanel, A., Demichelis, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4066 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Generalized correlation for biomolecular dynamics
Lange, O., & Grubmüller, H. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20784 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique
Nogales, E. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3694 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Gaussian split Ewald: A fast Ewald mesh method for molecular simulation
Shan, Y., Klepeis, J. L., Eastwood, M. P., Dror, R. O., & Shaw, D. E. (2005) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1839571 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Abrams, C. F., & Bussi, G. (2013) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e16010163 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Banáš, P., Hollas, D., Zgarbová, M., Jurečka, P., Orozco, M., Cheatham, T. E., Šponer, J., & Otyepka, M. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100481h · Cited by 374 · see citing works
A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9
Dagdas, Y. S., Chen, J. S., Sternberg, S. H., Doudna, J. A., & Yildiz, A. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao0027 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Self-citationReal-time observation of DNA recognition and rejection by the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9
Singh, D., Sternberg, S. H., Fei, J., Doudna, J. A., & Ha, T. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12778 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citationBrownian dynamics: Its application to ionic solutions
Turq, P., Lantelme, F., & Friedman, H. L. (1977) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.434317 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Lippert, R. A., Predescu, C., Ierardi, D. J., MacKenzie, K., Eastwood, M. P., Dror, R. O., & Shaw, D. E. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4825247 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Real-space and real-time dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 visualized by high-speed atomic force microscopy
Shibata, M., Nishimasu, H., Kodera, N., Hirano, S., Ando, T., Uchihashi, T., & Nureki, O. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01466-8 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas9 conformational activation as elucidated from enhanced molecular simulations
Palermo, G., Miao, Y., Walker, R. C., Jínek, M., & McCammon, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707645114 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationCatalytic Metal Ions and Enzymatic Processing of DNA and RNA
Palermo, G., Cavalli, A., Klein, M. L., Alfonso‐Prieto, M., Peraro, M. D., & Vivo, M. D. (2015) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar500314j · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationGraded activation and free energy landscapes of a muscarinic G-protein–coupled receptor
Miao, Y., & McCammon, J. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614538113 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationUnconstrained enhanced sampling for free energy calculations of biomolecules: a review
Miao, Y., & McCammon, J. A. (2016) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2015.1121541 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationStructural insights into DNA cleavage activation of CRISPR-Cas9 system
Huai, C., Li, G., Yao, R., Zhang, Y., Mi, C., Kong, L., Jia, C., Yuan, H., Chen, H., Lu, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01496-2 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Protein-peptide association kinetics beyond the seconds timescale from atomistic simulations
Paul, F., Wehmeyer, C., Abualrous, E. T., Wu, H., Crabtree, M., Schöneberg, J., Clarke, J., Freund, C., Weikl, T. R., & Noé, F. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01163-6 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Functional Insights Revealed by the Kinetic Mechanism of CRISPR/Cas9
Raper, A. T., Stephenson, A. A., & Suo, Z. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b13047 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Protospacer Adjacent Motif-Induced Allostery Activates CRISPR-Cas9
Palermo, G., Ricci, C. G., Fernando, A., Basak, R., Jínek, M., Rivalta, I., Batista, V. S., & McCammon, J. A. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b05313 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationThe chemistry of Cas9 and its CRISPR colleagues
Chen, J. S., & Doudna, J. A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-017-0078 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationPalermo, G., Miao, Y., Walker, R. C., Jínek, M., & McCammon, J. A. (2016) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.6b00218 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanism of the G-protein mimetic nanobody binding to a muscarinic G-protein-coupled receptor
Miao, Y., & McCammon, J. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1800756115 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationPicosecond to Millisecond Structural Dynamics in Human Ubiquitin
Lindorff‐Larsen, K., Maragakis, P., Piana, S., & Shaw, D. E. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b02024 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Mouchlis, V. D., Bucher, D., McCammon, J. A., & Dennis, E. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1424651112 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationStructures and mechanisms of CRISPR RNA-guided effector nucleases
Nishimasu, H., & Nureki, O. (2016) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2016.11.013 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Casalino, L., Palermo, G., Röthlisberger, U., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b01363 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationKinetics from Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Stelzl, L. S., & Hummer, G. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00372 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Casalino, L., Palermo, G., Spinello, A., Röthlisberger, U., & Magistrato, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1802963115 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationCasalino, L., Palermo, G., Abdurakhmonova, N., et al. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00905 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure and Dynamics of Cas9 HNH Domain Catalytic State
Zuo, Z., & Liu, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17578-6 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Palermo, G., Stenta, M., Cavalli, A., Peraro, M. D., & Vivo, M. D. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300691u · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationAllosteric Pathways in the PPARγ-RXRα nuclear receptor complex
Ricci, C. G., Silveira, R. L., Rivalta, I., Batista, V. S., & Skaf, M. S. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19940 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationReal‐time observation of flexible domain movements in CRISPR–Cas9
Osuka, S., Isomura, K., Kajimoto, S., Komori, T., Nishimasu, H., Shima, T., Nureki, O., & Uemura, S. (2018) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201796941 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Target Specificity of Cas9 Nuclease via DNA Rearrangement Regulated by the REC2 Domain
Sung, K., Park, J., Kim, Y.-G., Lee, N. K., & Kim, S. K. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b03102 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Allosteric Pathways in the PPAR gamma-RXR alpha nuclear receptor complex
Ricci, C. G., Silveira, R. L., Rivalta, I., et al. (2016) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Palermo G, Chen JS, Ricci CG, Rivalta I, Jinek M, Batista VS, Doudna JA, McCammon JA (2018). Key role of the REC lobe during CRISPR–Cas9 activation by ‘sensing’, ‘regulating’, and ‘locking’ the catalytic HNH domain. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 51, e9, 1– 11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583518000070 PMC6292676 30555184
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Allostery in Its Many Disguises: From Theory to Applications
Wodak, S. J., Paci, E., Dokholyan, N. V., Berezovsky, I. N., Horovitz, A., Li, J., Hilser, V. J., Bahar, I., Karanicolas, J., Stock, G., et al. (2019) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2019.01.003 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Self-citationStructural basis for Cas9 off-target activity
Pacesa, M., Lin, C.-H., Cléry, A., Saha, A., Arantes, P. R., Bargsten, K., Irby, M. J., Allain, F. H.-T., Palermo, G., Cameron, P., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.026 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Palermo, G., Chen, J. S., Ricci, C. G., Rivalta, I., Jinek, M., Batista, V. S., Doudna, J. A., & McCammon, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- San Diego Supercomputer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Palermo, Giulia
- ORCID
- Venue
- Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 51
- ISSN
- 0033-5835 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8994
- PMC
- PMC6292676
- OpenAlex
- W2885445984
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (MCB160059)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- San Diego Supercomputer Center (MCB160059)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (164698)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM031749)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, DNA cleavage, endonuclease activation, conformational dynamics, off-target specificity, genome editing, molecular dynamics simulation
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Humans, Catalytic Domain, Principal Component Analysis, DNA Cleavage, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review