Cited by 129Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesSoil and Environmental StudiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

Quality controlled radiocarbon dating of bones and charcoal from the early Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) of Motza (Israel)

Open access
Yizhaq, Meirav, Mintz, Genia, Cohen, Illit, Khalaily, Hamudi, Weiner, Steve, Boaretto, Elisabetta·2005·Radiocarbon

Abstract

Radiocarbon dating of early Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) deposits at the site of Motza, Israel, was achieved by first prescreening many charcoal and bone samples in order to identify those that are in the most suitable state of preservation for dating. For assessing bone preservation, we determined the collagen contents, and by infrared spectroscopy the collagen purity. The collagen samples of the best preserved bones were then further characterized by their C/N ratios and amino acid compositions. Prescreening of the charcoal samples involved monitoring the changes in infrared and Raman spectra during the acid-alkali-acid treatments. In some samples, we noted that the clay content increased with additional alkali treatments. These samples were rejected, as this could result in erroneous dates. No differences were observed in the 14 C dates between charcoal and bone collagen samples. The dates range from 10,600–10,100 cal BP, which is consistent with dates for the early PPNB from other sites. This is of much interest in terms of better understanding where and when domestication of animals began in this period, and how agriculture spread throughout the Levant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s003382220001969x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Charred seeds were pretreated with an acid-base-acid (ABA) procedure to remove all contaminants, following the methods of Yizhaq et al. (2005) and Rebollo et al. (2008).

    “Charred seeds were pretreated with an acid-base-acid (ABA) procedure to remove all the contaminants, following the methods of Yizhaq et al. (2005) and Rebollo et al. (2008).”

    From Absolute Chronology of Megiddo, Israel, in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages: High-Resolution Radiocarbon Dating (2014) · cites this paper as Yizhaq et al. (2005)

    The Charcoal Purification section describes an acid-alkali-acid cleaning procedure, so the paper supports the methodological reference in part. It applies that procedure to charcoal, not charred seeds, and the Discussion says most removable humic acid was extracted but residual fluorescence remained; it does not establish removal of all contaminants. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Alon D, Mintz Q Cohen I, Weiner S, Boaretto E. 2002. The use of Raman spectroscopy to monitor the re moval of humic substances from charcoal: quality control for 14 C dating of charcoal. Radiocarbon 44(1): 1-11.
  2. Bronk Ramsey C, Higham T, Bowles A, Hedges R. 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1): 155-63.
  3. Brown TA, Nelson DE, Vogel JS, Southon JR. 1988. Im proved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30(2):171-7.
  4. Carmi I, Segal D. 1992. Rehovot radiocarbon measure ments IV. Radiocarbon 34(1): 115-32.
  5. Cauvin J. 1987. Chronologie relative et absolue dans le Néolithique du Levant Nord et d'Anatolie entre 10,000 et 8000 BP. In: Aurenche O, Evin J, Hours F, editors. Chronologies in the Near East: Relative Chro nologies and Absolute Chronology 16,000-4000 BP. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 379:325^2.
  6. Delibrias Q Guillier MT, Labeyrie J. 1982. GIF natural radiocarbon measurements IX. Radiocarbon 24(3): 291-343.
  7. Gopher A. 1994. Arrowheads of the Neolithic Levant: A Seriation Analysis. American Schools of Oriental Research Dissertation Series 10. Winona Lake, Indi ana: Eisenbrauns. 325 p.
  8. Gopher A. 1996. What happened to the EPPNB? In: Ko- zlowski SK, Gebel HGK, editors. Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent, and Their https://doi.org/10.1017/S003382220001969X Published online by Cambridge University Press Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions. Berlin: Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 3. ρ 443-52.
  9. Kuijt I. 2003. Between foraging and farming; critically evaluating the archaeological evidence for the south ern Levantine early Pre-Pottery Neolithic period. Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal ofArchaeology 6:7-25.
  10. Kuijt I, Goring-Morris N. 2002. Foraging, farming, and complexity in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of the south ern Levant: a review and synthesis. Journal of World Prehistory 16:361-440.
  11. Law LA, Hedges REM. 1989. A semi-automated bone pretreatment of older and contaminated samples. Radiocarbon 31(3):247-53.
  12. Rollefson GO. 1998. The Aceramic Neolithic. In: Henry DO, editor. The Prehistoric Archaeology of Jordan. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 705:102-26.
  13. Stuckenrath R, Lawn B. 1969. University of Pennsylva nia radiocarbon dates XI. Radiocarbon 11 ( 1 ): 150-62.
  14. Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Bard E, Beck JW, Burr GS, Hughen KA, Kromer B, McCormac Q van der Plicht J, Spurk M. 1998. IntCal 98 radiocarbon age calibra tion, 24,000-0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3): 1041-84.
  15. Tuinstra F, Koenig JL. 1970. Raman spectra of graphite. Journal of Chemical Physics 53:1126-30.
  16. Weiner S, Bar-Yosef O. 1990. State of preservation of bones from prehistoric sites in the Near East: a survey. Journal of Archaeological Science 17:187-96.
  17. Yizhaq M. 2004. Characterizing and dating the early PPNB layer at the site of Motza [M.Sc. thesis]. Reho- vot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science.
  18. Ziv V. 1991. Crystal sizes in normal and osteopetrotic rat bone [M.Sc. thesis]. Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Insti tute of Science.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yizhaq, M., Mintz, G., Cohen, I., Khalaily, H., Weiner, S., & Boaretto, E.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Israel Antiquities Authority (IL)
Corresponding author
Boaretto, Elisabetta
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2005
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
193-206
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W1839041501
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0115488)
  • Harvard University
  • Arizona State University
  • University of Cambridge
  • La Trobe University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
Pre-Pottery Neolithic B, bone collagen, charcoal, radiocarbon dating, amino acid composition, clay contamination, animal domestication, ancient agriculture, Levant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review