Cited by 82Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesCultural Heritage Materials Analysis

Structural Characterization of Charcoal Exposed to High and Low Ph: Implications for 14C Sample Preparation and Charcoal Preservation

Open access
Rebollo, N R, Cohen-Ofri, I, Popovitz-Biro, R, Bar-Yosef, O, Meignen, L, Goldberg, P, Weiner, S, Boaretto, E·2008·Radiocarbon

Abstract

Chemical and structural similarities between poorly preserved charcoal and its contaminants, as well as low radiocarbon concentrations in old samples, complicate 14 C age determinations. Here, we characterize 4 fossil charcoal samples from the late Middle Paleolithic and early Upper Paleolithic strata of Kebara Cave, Israel, with respect to the structural and chemical changes that occur when they are subjected to the acid-base-acid (ABA) treatment. Differential thermal analysis and TEM show that acid treatment disrupts the structure, whereas alkali treatment results in the reformation of molecular aggregates. The major changes are ascribed to the formation of salt bridges at high pH and the disruption of the graphite-like crystallites at low pH. Weight losses during the treatments are consistently greater for older samples, implying that they are less well preserved. Based on the changes observed in vitro due to pH fluctuations, various methods for removing contamination, as well as a mechanism for preferential preservation of charcoal in nature, are proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200033592

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Charred seeds were pretreated with an acid-base-acid (ABA) procedure to remove all contaminants, following the methods of Yizhaq et al. (2005) and Rebollo et al. (2008).

    “Charred seeds were pretreated with an acid-base-acid (ABA) procedure to remove all the contaminants, following the methods of Yizhaq et al. (2005) and Rebollo et al. (2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rebollo, N. R., Cohen-Ofri, I., Popovitz-Biro, R., Bar-Yosef, O., Meignen, L., Goldberg, P., Weiner, S., & Boaretto, E.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Boaretto, E
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2008
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
289-307
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W2124329325
Cited by
82
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Keywords
fossil charcoal, salt bridges, graphite crystallites, Middle Palaeolithic, Upper Palaeolithic, Kebara Cave, differential thermal analysis, transmission electron microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review