Cited by 17Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchRadioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques

Advances in Handling Small Radiocarbon Samples at the Laboratoire de Mesure du Carbone 14 in Saclay, France

Open access
Delqué-Količ, E, Caffy, I, Comby-Zerbino, C, Dumoulin, J P, Hain, S, Massault, M, Moreau, C, Quiles, A +5 more·2013·Radiocarbon

Abstract

The Artemis accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) facility, installed in 2003 in Saclay, France, is devoted to radiocarbon measurements. Samples are submitted by scientists in the fields of Quaternary geology, environmental sciences, and archaeology. The entire preparation process, originally optimized for samples with about 1 mg of carbon, has been tested in recent years for samples with a lower carbon content. In particular, we prepared and measured carbonate and organic background and reference samples ranging in mass from 0.01 to 1 mg C. These tests helped define our protocol's practical limits and determine necessary improvements. Furthermore, our experiments demonstrated that satisfactory graphitization yields (80% and higher) and low background values can be obtained with samples down to 0.2 mg of carbon. For handling smaller samples, we developed a specific process. We tested smaller reactors (5 mL in volume) and adapted the reduction parameters (H 2 pressure and temperature) accordingly. We also tested the effect of a chemical water trap on graphitization yields and 14 C results. This paper presents in detail the aforementioned developments and reports the 14 C results obtained for background and standard small samples prepared with the modified reactors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200057805

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delqué-Količ, E., Caffy, I., Comby-Zerbino, C., Dumoulin, J. P., Hain, S., Massault, M., Moreau, C., Quiles, A., Setti, V, Souprayen, C., Tannau, J. F., Thellier, B., & Vincent, J.
Affiliations
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Delqué-Količ, E
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2013
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
648-656
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W2111962948
Cited by
17
References
12
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
Keywords
radiocarbon measurement, accelerator mass spectrometry, graphitization, hydrogen reduction, reference samples, carbonate sample, organic samples, sample preparation protocol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review