Cited by 456Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesRadioactive Decay and Measurement TechniquesScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

Reporting 14C Activities and Concentrations

Open access
Mook, Willem G, van der Plicht, Johannes·1999·Radiocarbon

Abstract

Three modes of reporting 14 C activities are in use, in part analogous to the internationally accepted (IAEA) conventions for stable isotopes: (1) absolute activity, the specific activity of 14 C or the activity per gram of carbon; (2) activity ratio, the ratio between the absolute activities of a sample and the standard; and (3) relative activity, the difference between the absolute activities of a sample and standard material, relative to the absolute standard activity. The basic definitions originate from decisions made by the radiocarbon community at its past conferences. Stuiver and Polach (1977) reviewed and sought to specify the definitions and conventions. Several colleagues, however, have experienced inadequacies and pitfalls in the definitions and use of symbols. Furthermore, the latter have to be slightly amended because of the use of modern measuring techniques. This paper is intended to provide a consistent set of reporting symbols and definitions, illustrated by some practical examples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200057106

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Meijer HAJ, Li WJ.1998. The use of electrolysis for ac- Journal of Geology 62:115. curate b17O and 5180 isotope measurements in water.
  2. p. Mook WG. 2000. Environmental isotopes in the hydro- Karldn I, Olsson IU, Kallberg P, Killicci S. 1966. Abso- logical cycle. Vol. 1. Introduction, principles, meth- lute determination of the activity of two 14C dating ods. UNESCOIIAEA. 255 p. standards. Arkiv for Geofysik 6:465-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mook, W. G., & van der Plicht, J.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
1999
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
227-239
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W2102534963
Cited by
456
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Keywords
radiocarbon dating, specific activity, activity ratios, relative activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review