The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Time of Herbicide Application on Control of Kudzu
Abstract
Field experiments were conducted during 1968 to 1970 to determine the influence of time of herbicide application on control of kudzu [Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi]. Picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) effectively controlled kudzu when applications were made as early as May 22 and as late as October 28. Acceptable control was obtained with rates of picloram 0.34 kg/ha or higher. In contrast, (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4,5-T) was most effective when applied during the first half of summer. Essentially no control of kudzu was obtained from 2,4,5-T applied 1 week before the first killing frost.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kudzu control is generally greatest when herbicides are applied in mid to late summer.
“In general, kudzu control was greatest when herbicides were applied in mid to late summer (Dickens and Buchanan 1971;Miller 1986).”
From Kudzu (Pueraria montana) community responses to herbicides, burning, and high-density loblolly pine (2003) · cites this paper as Dickens and Buchanan 1971
Citations
Cites
Principles of Field Crop Production
Martin, J. H., Leonard, W. H., & Stamp, D. L. (1976) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 432
Klingman, G. C. (1963) · Weeds · doi:10.2307/4040713 · Cited by 84
Behrens, R. (1962) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400060033x · Cited by 82
Principles of Field Crop Production
Willard, C. J. (1950) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1950.00021962004200040013x · Cited by 80
Davis, D., & Funderburk, H. H. (1964) · Weeds · doi:10.2307/4040646 · Cited by 10
Progress report on control of honeysuckle and kudzu.
Brewder, E. V. (1960) · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Robbins, 1952, Weed Control, 195
- Brender, 1965, Further progress in the control of kudzu, Down to Earth, 20, 16
- Couch, 1965, Kudzu control with Tordon, Proc. So. Weed Conf., 18, 309
- Brender, 1961, Control of honeysuckle and kudzu, U. S. For. Serv., S. E. For. Exp. Sta. Paper, 120, 9
- Couch, 1966, Kudzu control with Tordon, Down to Earth, 22, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forseth, I. N., & Innis, A. F. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680490505150 · Cited by 263
Kudzu: where did it come from? And how can we stop it?
Miller, J. H., & Edwards, B. (1983) · Southern Journal of Applied Forestry · doi:10.1093/sjaf/7.3.165 · Cited by 63
Kudzu (Pueraria montana) community responses to herbicides, burning, and high-density loblolly pine
Harrington, T. B., Rader-Dixon, L. T., & Taylor, J. W. (2003) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/02-142 · Cited by 40
Lindgren, C., Castro, K. L., Coiner, H. A., Nurse, R. E., & Darbyshire, S. J. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Plant Science · doi:10.4141/cjps2012-128 · Cited by 38
Comparison of Aminocyclopyrachlor to Common Herbicides for Kudzu (Pueraria montana) Management
Minogue, P. J., Enloe, S. F., Osiecka, A., & Lauer, D. K. (2011) · Invasive Plant Science and Management · doi:10.1614/ipsm-d-11-00024.1 · Cited by 22
Effect of cutting date and frequency on yield and quality of kudzu in the southern United States
Terrill, T. H., Gelaye, S., Mahotiere, S., Amoah, E. A., Miller, S., & Windham, W. R. (2003) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2494.2003.00369.x · Cited by 18
Grebner, D. L., Ezell, A. W., Prevost, J., & Gaddis, D. A. (2011) · Journal of Sustainable Forestry · doi:10.1080/10549811.2011.530559 · Cited by 15
EXOTIC INVASIVE PLANTS IN KENTUCKY
Liang, Y. (2010) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickens, R., & Buchanan, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Auburn University (US)
- Venue
- Weed Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1971-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 669-671
- ISSN
- 0043-1745 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2759
- OpenAlex
- W2947342036
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Weed Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Biological Control of Invasive Species
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- Pueraria lobata, herbicide application timing, picloram, 2,4,5-T, herbicide efficacy, weed control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
