The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN)
Abstract
Brain mechanisms extracting invariant information from varying auditory inputs were studied using the mismatch-negativity (MMN) brain response. We wished to determine whether the preattentive sound-analysis mechanisms, reflected by MMN, are capable of extracting invariant relationships based on abstract conjunctions between two sound features. The standard stimuli varied over a large range in frequency and intensity dimensions following the rule that the higher the frequency, the louder the intensity. The occasional deviant stimuli violated this frequency-intensity relationship and elicited an MMN. The results demonstrate that preattentive processing of auditory stimuli extends to unexpectedly complex relationships between the stimulus features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms
Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029 · Cited by 1,441
“, 1992); independently of their absolute frequencies, and by violations of the rule that the higher the frequency, the louder the intensity (Paavilainen et al., 2001).”
BackgroundInfluential‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex
Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., & Winkler, I. (2001) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01790-2 · Cited by 832
Self-citationModeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects
Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.003 · Cited by 559
Self-citationMismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained
May, P. J. C., & Tiitinen, H. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00856.x · Cited by 549
Predictive coding of music – Brain responses to rhythmic incongruity
Vuust, P., Ostergaard, L., Pallesen, K. J., Bailey, C., & Roepstorff, A. (2009) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.014 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- PAAVILAINEN, P., SIMOLA, J., JARAMILLO, M., NÄÄTÄNEN, R., & WINKLER, I.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 359-365
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012772270
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0048577201000920
- The paper
- PAAVILAINEN, P., SIMOLA, J., JARAMILLO, M., NÄÄTÄNEN, R., & WINKLER, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048577201000920
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
