The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dominance: The baby and the bathwater
Abstract
The concept of dominance is used in the behavioral and biological sciences to describe outcomes in a variety of competitive interactions. In some taxa, a history of agonistic encounters among individuals modifies the course of future agonistic encounters such that the existence of a certain type of relationship can be inferred. If one is to characterize such relationships as dominance, however, then they must be distinguished from other kinds of interaction patterns for which the term tends to be used, as well as from factors such as territoriality and "trained" winners and losers, which may also influence the expression of agonistic behavior. Operational definitions based on causal, functional, evolutionary, and ontogenetic considerations have been proposed. Reliability and validity problems have been discussed, but the dominance concept has proved useful despite methodological difficulties. The confusion of dominance relationships (which involve two or more individuals) with dominance ranks (which are assigned to a single individual) has obscured the possible evolutionary basis of dominance relationships. If benefits accrue to dominant members of pairs, then those attributes which allow an animal to establish dominance can be selected. Dominance per se and dominance ranks, on the other hand, cannot be genetically transmitted since they constitute relationships with other individuals rather than absolute attributes. Dominance rankings in particular may be useful for describing behavioral patterns within a group, but they may reflect our own ability to count rather than any important variable in social organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons: A Field Study
Kummer, H. (1967) · Bibliotheca Primatologica · doi:10.1159/isbn.978-3-8055-0286-3 · Cited by 763
Territory formation by laboratory mice
Mackintosh, J. H. (1970) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(70)90088-6 · Cited by 205
Lore, R., & Flannelly, K. (1977) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0577-106 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Testosterone and dominance in men
Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x98001228 · Cited by 1,447
Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions
Panksepp, J. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00012759 · Cited by 999
Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups.
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.116 · Cited by 987
The Ontogenesis of Social Dominance: A Strategy-Based Evolutionary Perspective
Hawley, P. H. (1999) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470 · Cited by 877
Hawley, P. H. (2003) · Merrill-Palmer Quarterly · doi:10.1353/mpq.2003.0013 · Cited by 641
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernstein, I. S.
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1981-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 419-429
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2080198858
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 45.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dominance: The baby and the bathwater. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0140525x00009614
- The paper
- Bernstein, I. S. (1981). Dominance: The baby and the bathwater. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00009614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.