CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,164Language and cultural evolutionAction Observation and SynchronizationNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 375 of the 377 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics.

Arbib, Michael A.·2005·Behavioral and Brain Sciences
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x05000038
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The article analyzes the neural and functional grounding of language skills as well as their emergence in hominid evolution, hypothesizing stages leading from abilities known to exist in monkeys and apes and presumed to exist in our hominid ancestors right through to modern spoken and signed languages. The starting point is the observation that both premotor area F5 in monkeys and Broca's area in humans contain a "mirror system" active for both execution and observation of manual actions, and that F5 and Broca's area are homologous brain regions. This grounded the mirror system hypothesis of Rizzolatti and Arbib (1998) which offers the mirror system for grasping as a key neural "missing link" between the abilities of our nonhuman ancestors of 20 million years ago and modern human language, with manual gestures rather than a system for vocal communication providing the initial seed for this evolutionary process. The present article, however, goes "beyond the mirror" to offer hypotheses on evolutionary changes within and outside the mirror systems which may have occurred to equip Homo sapiens with a language-ready brain. Crucial to the early stages of this progression is the mirror system for grasping and its extension to permit imitation. Imitation is seen as evolving via a so-called simple system such as that found in chimpanzees (which allows imitation of complex "object-oriented" sequences but only as the result of extensive practice) to a so-called complex system found in humans (which allows rapid imitation even of complex sequences, under appropriate conditions) which supports pantomime. This is hypothesized to have provided the substrate for the development of protosign, a combinatorially open repertoire of manual gestures, which then provides the scaffolding for the emergence of protospeech (which thus owes little to nonhuman vocalizations), with protosign and protospeech then developing in an expanding spiral. It is argued that these stages involve biological evolution of both brain and body. By contrast, it is argued that the progression from protosign and protospeech to languages with full-blown syntax and compositional semantics was a historical phenomenon in the development of Homo sapiens, involving few if any further biological changes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x05000038

Cites

375 of 375 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–375 of 375

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,164

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Arbib, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Arbib, Michael A.
ORCID
Arbib, Michael A.
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2005-04
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
105-124
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
DOI
10.1017/s0140525x05000038
OpenAlex
W2156256694
Cited by
1,164
References
377
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 138
FWCI
1471.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 133 d)
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
language evolution, mirror system, Broca's area, hominid evolution, imitation, pantomime, hand gestures, human action recognition, chimpanzees, neurolinguistics
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Haplorhini, Brain, Biological Evolution, Frontal Lobe, Gestures, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Language Development, Motor Cortex, Neurons, Psycholinguistics, Psychomotor Performance, Semantics, Sign Language, Vocalization, Animal, Hominidae, Neurolinguistic Programming, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review