Cited by 1,950Action Observation and SynchronizationEmbodied and Extended CognitionChild and Animal Learning Development

Joint action: bodies and minds moving together

Open access
SEBANZ, N, BEKKERING, H, KNOBLICH, G·2006·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

The ability to coordinate our actions with those of others is crucial for our success as individuals and as a species. Progress in understanding the cognitive and neural processes involved in joint action has been slow and sparse, because cognitive neuroscientists have predominantly studied individual minds and brains in isolation. However, in recent years, major advances have been made by investigating perception and action in social context. In this article we outline how studies on joint attention, action observation, task sharing, action coordination and agency contribute to the understanding of the cognitive and neural processes supporting joint action. Several mechanisms are proposed that allow individuals to share representations, to predict actions, and to integrate predicted effects of own and others' actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • External and visible joint action corresponds to an internal and biological joint action.

    “we claim that external and visible joint action corresponds to an internal and biological joint action.”

    From Music structure determines heart rate variability of singers (2013) · cites this paper as Sebanz et al., 2006

  • Interpersonal synchrony facilitates social bonding, cohesion and exchange (the 'social glue').

    “It is an evolutionary-based mechanism that facilitates social bonding, cohesion and exchange (i.e., it is a “social glue”)1–4.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SEBANZ, N., BEKKERING, H., & KNOBLICH, G.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
SEBANZ, N
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
70-76
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086207208
Cited by
1,950
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 129 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 98 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 82
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Jiangsu Association for Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
joint action, joint attention, action observation, task sharing, action coordination, agency, shared representations, action prediction, social cognition
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Psychophysiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review