Dying for the group: towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice
Abstract
Whether upheld as heroic or reviled as terrorism, people have been willing to lay down their lives for the sake of their groups throughout history. Why? Previous theories of extreme self-sacrifice have highlighted a range of seemingly disparate factors, such as collective identity, outgroup hostility, and kin psychology. In this paper, I attempt to integrate many of these factors into a single overarching theory based on several decades of collaborative research with a range of special populations, from tribes in Papua New Guinea to Libyan insurgents and from Muslim fundamentalists in Indonesia to Brazilian football hooligans. These studies suggest that extreme self-sacrifice is motivated by identity fusion, a visceral sense of oneness with the group, resulting from intense collective experiences (e.g., painful rituals or the horrors of frontline combat) or from perceptions of shared biology. In ancient foraging societies, fusion would have enabled warlike bands to stand united despite strong temptations to scatter and flee. The fusion mechanism has often been exploited in cultural rituals, not only by tribal societies but also in specialized cells embedded in armies, cults, and terrorist organizations. With the rise of social complexity and the spread of states and empires, fusion has also been extended to much larger groups, including doctrinal religions, ethnicities, and ideological movements. Explaining extreme self-sacrifice is not only a scientific priority but also a practical challenge as we seek a collective response to suicide, terrorism, and other extreme expressions of outgroup hostility that continue to bedevil humanity today.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Identity fusion theory explains extreme self-sacrifice through a visceral sense of oneness with a group.
“Identity fusion theory explains extreme self-sacrifice through a visceral sense of oneness with a group (39, 40)”
From Volunteerism as a multidimensional form of human prosocial engagement (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241 · see citing works
The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.
Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047195 · Cited by 1,297 · see citing works
The architecture of human kin detection
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05510 · Cited by 748 · see citing works
Comments on Part I: Psychological essentialism
Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989) · Similarity and Analogical Reasoning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511529863.009 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
SOSIS, R., KRESS, H., & BOSTER, J. (2007) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.02.007 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Bloom, P. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100334 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Park, J. H., & Schaller, M. (2005) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.013 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nationalism as collective narcissism
Cichocka, A., & Cislak, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.013 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Within-group synchronization in the prefrontal cortex associates with intergroup conflict
Yang, J., Zhang, H., Ni, J., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Ma, Y. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0630-x · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Volunteerism as a multidimensional form of human prosocial engagement
Sarid, O. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1908108
- Authors
- Whitehouse, H.
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 41
- ISSN
- 0140-525X
- 1469-1825
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review