Cited by 191Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionEuropean Cultural and National Identity

Nationalism as collective narcissism

Cichocka, Aleksandra, Cislak, Aleksandra·2020·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.013

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cichocka, A., & Cislak, A.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Cichocka, Aleksandra
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
34
Pages
69-74
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005265508
Cited by
191
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › European Cultural and National Identity
Keywords
collective narcissism, nationalism, national greatness, intergroup relations, social cohesion, psychological needs, recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review