Cited by 30Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Compensation in autism is not consistent with social motivation theory

Open access
Livingston, Lucy Anne, Shah, Punit, Happé, Francesca·2019·Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Abstract

Growing evidence, as presented by Jaswal & Akhtar, indicates that social motivation is not universally reduced in autism. Here, we evaluate and extend this argument in light of recent evidence of “compensation” in autism. We thereby argue that autistic “compensators” – exhibiting neurotypical behaviour despite persistent difficulties in social cognition – indicate intact or potentially heightened social motivation in autism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x18002388

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced social involvement in some autistic people may be a consequence of exhaustion from camouflaging (emulating typical non-autistic interaction style), not necessarily lower social motivation.

    “An important nuance to make here, is that although some autistic people show less involvement in social interaction, this might not necessarily be the result of lower social motivation, but rather it may be a consequence of exhaustion from trying to emulate a typical non-autistic style of interaction, known sometimes as camouflaging (e.g., Cook et al., 2021; Livingston et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livingston, L. A., Shah, P., & Happé, F.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2019
Volume
42
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W2963064544
Cited by
30
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, social motivation, compensation, social cognition, social motivation theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review