Cited by 125

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language

Yelland, Gregory W., Pollard, Jacinta, Mercuri, Anthony·1993·Applied Psycholinguistics

Abstract

This study examined whether the often-reported metalinguistic benefits of childhood bilingualism extend to children whose experience with a second language is considerably more limited, and if so, whether this metalinguistic advantage flows on to reading acquisition. Its purpose was to provide direct evidence of a causal role for metalinguistic awareness in reading acquisition. The study focused on the developing word awareness skills of two groups of preparatory and grade 1 children: one group was strictly monolingual in English; the other, the “marginal bilingual” group, consisted of English monolingual who were participating in a second language program that provided I hour of Italian instruction each week.After only 6 months of instruction in Italian, the marginal bilingual children showed a significantly higher level word awareness than their monolingual counterparts. This advantage weakened across grade 1, as both groups approached ceiling levels of performance. Nonetheless, the initial advantage flows through to the first major step in reading acquisition, with the grade 1 marginal bilinguals showing significantly greater word recognition skill than the monolinguals, thus strengthening the argument for a causal role in reading acquisition for word awareness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0142716400010687

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Roehr-Brackin (2018) reviewed research underscoring the link between the onset of literacy and the development of metalinguistic awareness.

    “Roehr-Brackin (2018) has reviewed research underscoring the link between the onset of literacy and the development of metalinguistic awareness (see also, Bialystok, 2001;Yelland et al., 1993).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Bates, 1979, The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy
  2. 10.1017/S0142716400000278 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1980.tb00356.x · DOI
  4. Vygotsky, 1986, Thought and language
  5. Vellutino, 1987, Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321
  6. Ellis, 1984, Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis
  7. Tunmer, 1989, Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle, 91
  8. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.1.37 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.560 · DOI
  10. Bruce, 1964, An analysis of word sounds by young children, British Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 158
  11. Share, 1984, Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1309
  12. 10.1007/BF02653717 · DOI
  13. Rubin, 1989, Linguistic awareness skills in grade one children in a French immersion setting, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, I, 73
  14. Raz, 1990, Social background, phonological awareness and children's reading, British Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 209
  15. 10.2307/1129787 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF01067062 · DOI
  17. 10.17763/haer.40.2.y7u0242x76w05624 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/1130663 · DOI
  19. Coltheart, 1980, Deep dyslexia
  20. Wallach, 1976, Teaching all children to read
  21. 10.1080/00220671.1982.10885429 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF02653842 · DOI
  23. 10.3998/mpub.12236 · DOI
  24. Ben, 1977, The influence of bilingualism on cognitive strategy and cognitive development, Child Development, 48, 1009, 10.2307/1128353 · DOI
  25. Templeton, 1980, The concept of word in young children as a function of level of cognitive development, Research in Teaching of English, 14, 265, 10.58680/rte198015799 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/h0082251 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/S0272263100000437 · DOI
  28. 10.3758/BF03202453 · DOI
  29. 10.2307/747683 · DOI
  30. 10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.429 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/074193258500600604 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/BF01067389 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0361-476X(76)90020-5 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/00221325.1984.10532453 · DOI
  35. Chomsky, 1970, Basic studies in reading, 3
  36. 10.1080/00221325.1971.10532612 · DOI
  37. 10.2307/1131033 · DOI
  38. 10.1598/RRQ.23.3.1 · DOI
  39. Tyler, 1981, Quick on the uptake, New Scientist, 89, 608
  40. 10.1016/0022-0965(74)90101-5 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Piaget, 1929, The child's conception of the world
  42. Hakuta, 1985, Children's language, 319
  43. 10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.686 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0022-0965(89)90004-0 · DOI
  45. Harris, 1986, Language processing in children and adults: An introduction
  46. 10.1177/002221948401701005 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1985.tb01138.x · DOI
  48. Pisoni, 1987, Spoken word recognition, 21
  49. 10.1598/RRQ.26.1.3 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/747762 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90005-3 · DOI
  52. Heilman, 1981, Principles and practices of teaching reading
  53. 10.1038/301419a0 · DOI
  54. 10.2307/1130458 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/978-3-642-69113-3_9 · DOI
  56. Liberman, 1989, Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle, 1
  57. 10.1007/978-3-642-69113-3_4 · DOI
  58. 10.1097/00011363-198703000-00004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yelland, G. W., Pollard, J., & Mercuri, A.
Venue
Applied Psycholinguistics
Published
1993-10
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
423-444
ISSN
  • 0142-7164
  • 1469-1817
Cited by
125
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review