Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What promotes success in L2 suprasegmental learning in foreign language classroom settings? The roles of perceptual, cognitive, and experiential individual differences in the acquisition of English word stress

Hosaka, Izumi, Saito, Kazuya·2026·Applied Psycholinguistics

Abstract

This study investigates how individual differences in perceptual-cognitive aptitude and L2 learning experience shape the acquisition of English word stress in foreign language (FL) classroom settings, addressing gaps in prior research that has primarily focused on L2 segmental learning. A total of 119 Japanese English-as-a-foreign-language students completed a word stress identification task alongside measures of auditory processing, working memory, and L2 learning experience. Their performance was assessed in terms of both accuracy and processing fluency (reaction time and response stability). Results showed that learners with more precise auditory processing, higher working memory capacity, and more frequent L2 use outside the classroom demonstrated greater accuracy in perceiving English word stress. In contrast, classroom-based experience and the length or onset of FL learning had limited impact. Processing fluency was only weakly related to these factors, showing substantial individual variability. The findings suggest that in input-limited FL contexts, successful L2 suprasegmental learning depends heavily on perceptual-cognitive aptitude and opportunities for L2 use beyond the classroom.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0142716426100460

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 109

  1. 10.1016/j.system.2009.03.001 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1367006912466314 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/1744-9081-7-44 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/9781108886901.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/xlm0001246 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/S1366728904001592 · DOI
  7. Baker-Smemoe, 2012, Relationship between reported out-of-class English use and gains in English, Applied Language Learning, 22, 21
  8. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Flege, 2009, Input matters in SLA, 175
  10. 10.1111/lang.12242 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.02.004 · DOI
  12. 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x · DOI
  13. Freed, 1990, Linguistics, language teaching and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice and research, 459
  14. 10.1017/S0272263120000649 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0267190524000047 · DOI
  16. Dekeyser, 2012, Automatization, Skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition, The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 40, 63
  17. 10.1017/S0142716415000259 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/S1366728922000700 · DOI
  19. 10.4324/9780203851357 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1017/S0142716408080089 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/0267658320978493 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/lang.12414 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/S0272263117000249 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104481 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/S027226312300044X · DOI
  26. Schmidt, 2001, Motivation and second language acquisition, 313
  27. 10.1017/S0272263120000467 · DOI
  28. Jiang, 2011, Conducting reaction time research in second language studies
  29. 10.4324/9781003022497-7 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x · DOI
  31. 10.1017/S1366728912000703 · DOI
  32. 10.21832/ISAACS6848 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105236 · DOI
  34. Wang, Q. (2008). Perception of English stress by Mandarin Chinese learners of English: An acoustic study (Doctoral dissertation).
  35. 10.1017/S0142716414000137 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.001 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/tesq.34 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/applin/amm056 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/00238309020450030101 · DOI
  40. 10.1121/1.4926561 · DOI
  41. 10.1017/S0272263117000432 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/applin/amu072 · DOI
  43. Darcy, 2014, Attention control and inhibition influence phonological development in a second language, Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 115
  44. 10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor · DOI
  45. 10.2307/3588487 · DOI
  46. 10.1121/1.428217 · DOI
  47. 10.1075/z.208 · DOI
  48. 10.1075/jslp.21042.gor · DOI
  49. 10.1017/S027226311500042X · DOI
  50. DeKeyser, 2003, The handbook of second language acquisition, 313
  51. 10.1017/S0142716400010572 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/nyas.12627 · DOI
  53. 10.2307/3588378 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/lang.12447 · DOI
  55. 10.1017/S0142716420000491 · DOI
  56. Tsujimura, 1996, Annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 22, 406
  57. 10.1017/S0272263198002034 · DOI
  58. 10.1017/S0142716409990014 · DOI
  59. 10.1006/jpho.2002.0174 · DOI
  60. 10.1017/S0272263199001035 · DOI
  61. 10.4324/9781315676968-2 · DOI
  62. 10.4324/9781315122021-4 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Miyake, 1998, Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention, 339
  64. 10.1017/S026144482510102X · DOI
  65. 10.1017/S0272263119000603 · DOI
  66. 10.1075/jslp.17038.tho · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005 · DOI
  68. 10.1121/1.1912375 · DOI
  69. 10.1017/9781108886901 · DOI
  70. 10.1159/000261655 · DOI
  71. 10.1163/9789004653412 · DOI
  72. 10.1017/S0142716407070312 · DOI
  73. Saito, 2024, Auditory processing as perceptual, cognitive, and motoric abilities underlying successful second language acquisition: Interaction model, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50, 119
  74. 10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_3 · DOI
  75. 10.1017/S0272263101004041 · DOI
  76. 10.1017/S0142716400010845 · DOI
  77. 10.1177/1362168816643111 · DOI
  78. 10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.36366/frontiers.v15i1.223 · DOI
  80. 10.1017/S0272263112000150 · DOI
  81. 10.1111/lang.12161 · DOI
  82. 10.4324/9780429449642-4 · DOI
  83. 10.1111/lang.12000 · DOI
  84. 10.1121/1.1908095 · DOI
  85. Kormos, 2015, The Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics)
  86. 10.4324/9781003414643 · DOI
  87. 10.1017/S0272263106060013 · DOI
  88. 10.1177/002383095800100207 · DOI
  89. Lee, 2021, Non-native English listeners adaptation to native English speakers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1, 1
  90. 10.1017/S1366728925100850 · DOI
  91. 10.1111/lang.12561 · DOI
  92. 10.1017/S0142716420000193 · DOI
  93. 10.1017/S0272263104262027 · DOI
  94. 10.1111/lang.12322 · DOI
  95. 10.1075/jslp.21035.dar · DOI
  96. 10.1515/iral.2011.016 · DOI
  97. Konishi, T. , & Kondo, M. (2015). Developmental change in English stress manifestation by Japanese Speakers. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Science, Glasgow, UK, Paper No.10291, 10–14August, 2015.
  98. 10.1177/0267658307082981 · DOI
  99. Mora, 2017, Task-based pronunciation teaching and research: Key issues and future directions, System, 39, 381
  100. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x · DOI
  101. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00434.x · DOI
  102. 10.1073/pnas.1204319109 · DOI
  103. 10.1111/ijal.12026 · DOI
  104. 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279 · DOI
  105. 10.1177/0963721411429458 · DOI · Paper page
  106. 10.21832/9781853598937 · DOI
  107. 10.1093/applin/amu024 · DOI
  108. Wisniewska, 2020, Can captioned video benefit second language pronunciation?, System, 42, 599
  109. 10.1075/bpa.3.12dar · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Hosaka, I., & Saito, K.
Affiliations
University College London Institute of Education
Venue
Applied Psycholinguistics
Published
2026
Volume
47
ISSN
  • 0142-7164
  • 1469-1817
Cited by
3
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review