Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Losing Access to the Native Language While Immersed in a Second Language: Evidence for the Role of Inhibition in Second-Language Learning

Linck, Jared A., Kroll, Judith F., Sunderman, Gretchen·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

Adults are notoriously poor second-language (L2) learners. A context that enables successful L2 acquisition is language immersion. In this study, we investigated the effects of immersion learning for a group of university students studying abroad in Spain. Our interest was in the effect of immersion on the native language (L1), English. We tested the hypothesis that immersion benefits L2 learning as a result of attenuated influence of the L1. Participants were English-speaking learners of Spanish who were either immersed in Spanish while living in Spain or exposed to Spanish in the classroom only. Performance on both comprehension and production tasks showed that immersed learners outperformed their classroom counterparts with respect to L2 proficiency. However, the results also revealed that immersed learners had reduced L1 access. The pattern of data is most consistent with the interpretation that the L1 was inhibited while the learners were immersed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.004 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1341 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brysbaert M., 2007, “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Some simple SPSS solutions to a complex problem (Version 2.0)
  4. 10.1017/S1366728904001452 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.004 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.302 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.013 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1001 · DOI
  9. Dijkstra T., 2005, Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 179
  10. 10.1017/S1366728902003012 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1017/S0272263103000238 · DOI
  12. 10.1017/S1366728906002847 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/S1366728907003203 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1075/sibil.9 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0894-4105.16.4.562 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.001 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/S0142716402004058 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1017/S1366728906002483 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1191/0267658302sr201oa · DOI
  22. 10.1177/13670069050090010301 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01844.x · DOI
  24. 10.1075/ml.3.3.06lin · DOI
  25. 10.3758/BF03192962 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/S1366728903001068 · DOI
  27. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2602 · DOI
  28. Miyake A., 1998, Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention, 339
  29. 10.1037/h0020586 · DOI
  30. 10.1017/S0272263106060177 · DOI
  31. 10.1017/S1366728999000140 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/713755607 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University
  • Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics, The Florida State University
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-12
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
1507-1515
ISSN
  • 0956-7976
  • 1467-9280
Cited by
356
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review