CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,356Policy Transfer and LearningEvaluation and Performance AssessmentPublic Policy and Administration Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What is Lesson-Drawing?

Rose, Richard·1991·Journal of Public Policy
DOI 10.1017/s0143814x00004918
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Lesson-drawing addresses the question: Under what circumstances and to what extent can a programme that is effective in one place transfer to another. Searching for fresh knowledge is not normal; the second section describes the stimulus to search as dissatisfaction with the status quo. Lessons can be sought by searching across time and/or across space; the choice depends upon a subjective definition of proximity, epistemic communities linking experts together, functional interdependence between governments, and the authority of intergovernmental institutions. The process of lesson-drawing starts with scanning programmes in effect elsewhere, and ends with the prospective evaluation of what would happen if a programme already in effect elsewhere were transferred here in future. Lesson-drwaing is part of a contested political process; there is no assurance that a lesson drawn will be both desirable and practical. The conclusion considers the uncertainty and instability of judgements about the practicality and desirability of transferring programmes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0143814x00004918

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Carlson, 1986, Lessons from Europe: the Role of the Employment Security System
  2. 1988, Why Economic Policies Change Course: Eleven Case Studies
  3. Rose, Lesson-Drawing Across Time and Space
  4. Rose, 1990, Training without Trainers? Avoiding the Supply-Side Bottleneck
  5. Anderson, 1978, Comparing Public Policies, 19
  6. Haas, Effluents and Influence: the Politics of Mediterranean Pollution Control
  7. Cooper, 1989, Can Nations Agree?, 178
  8. 1990, Book of the States 1990–91
  9. 1986, Working Together – Education and Training
  10. Camdessus, 1980, Managing Director's Response, IMF Survey, 16, 115
  11. Kuhn, 1962, Th Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  12. Pressman, 1974, Implementation
  13. Dommergues, 1989, Mechanisms for fob Creation: Lessons from the United States
  14. Deutsch, 1963, The Nerves of Government

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–998 of 998

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rose, R.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Rose, Richard
ORCID
Rose, Richard
Venue
Journal of Public Policy
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1991-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3-30
ISSN
  • 0143-814X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7815
DOI
10.1017/s0143814x00004918
OpenAlex
W2041504781
Cited by
1,356
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 51
FWCI
50.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 6541 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Public Policy (publishedVersion)
  • OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
lesson-drawing, policy transfer, policy learning, epistemic communities, intergovernmental institutions, functional interdependence, policy uncertainty, policy evaluation, political contestation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review