Cited by 67Technology Use by Older AdultsIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The impact of information and communication technology on family carers of older people and professionals in Sweden

Open access
MAGNUSSON, LENNART, HANSON, ELIZABETH, NOLAN, MIKE·2005·Ageing and Society

Abstract

Government policy in Sweden, as in other developed countries, pays increasing attention as to how best to support the family carers of older people. New and innovative means of support, such as information and communication technology, are emerging. This paper explores the perceived benefits of, and barriers to, information technology as a means of supporting family carers of older people. Following a brief overview of the care-giving literature, with particular reference to the Swedish context, interview and questionnaire data collected from 34 families who took part in the Swedish ACTION project are used to explore the role of user-friendly information and communication technology to inform and enable family carers of older people to exercise choice, to care more effectively and to work in partnership with professionals. Interview data from two groups of professionals that utilised ACTION are also examined to throw light on its potential benefits for both carers and professionals. Consideration is given to the barriers to using information technology, and to identifying those carers most likely to benefit. Areas for further development are the need for practitioners' education and a wider range of programmes to address carers' diverse needs. Clearly, lessons learned from the Swedish project have wider relevance, given that new forms of support are being developed in most technically advanced countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x05003673

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Arnaert, A. and Delesie, L. 2001. Telenursing for the elderly : the case for care via video- telephony. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 7, 311-6.
  2. Askham, J. 1998. Supporting caregivers of older people : an overview of problems and priorities. Australian Journal of Ageing, 17, 5-7.
  3. Bass, D., McClendon, M., Flatley Brennan, P. and McCarthy, C. 1998. The buffering effect of a computer support network on caregiver strain. Journal of Aging and Health, 10, 20-43.
  4. Cherry, J., Colliflower, S. and Tsiperfal, A. 2000. Meeting the challenges of case management with remote patient monitoring technology. Lippincott's Case Management, 5, 191-8.
  5. Clyburn, L. D., Stones, M. J., Hadjistquropoulos, T. and Tuckko, H. 2000. Predicting caregiver burden and depression in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Gerontology, Social Sciences, 55B, S2-13.
  6. Cooke, D. D., McNally, L., Mulligan, K. T., Harrison, M. J. G. and Newman, S. P. 2001. Psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia : a systematic review. Aging and Mental Health, 5, 120-35.
  7. Hanson, E., Tetley, J. and Shewan, J. 2000. Supporting family carers using interactive multimedia. British Journal of Nursing, 9, 713-9.
  8. Irvine, B. 2003. Computers for Caregiving. Paper given at the Setting Priorities for Retirement Years (SPRY) Foundation National Conference, Computer-based technology and care- giving for older adults, October 2-3, Betheseda, Maryland.
  9. Loomis, J. 2003. Florida Dementia Caregivers Home Telehealth Support Network. Paper presented at the International Conference on Aging, Disability & Independence, Washington DC, December. Available online at www.AlzOnline.net [Accessed October 21, 2004].
  10. Magnusson, L., Berthold, H., Hanson, E., Chambers, M., Brito, L. and O'Reilly, A. 1999. Carers tap into the information highway. Nursing Times, 95, 48-50.
  11. Magnusson, L., Hanson, E. and Nolan, M. 2002. Assisting carers using the ACTION model for working with family carers. British Journal of Nursing, 11, 759-63.
  12. Magnusson, L, Hanson, E., Chambers, M., Berthold, H., Brito, L. and Daly, T. 2002. Supporting family carers through the use of information technology -the EU project ACTION. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39, 369-81.
  13. Magnusson, L, Hanson, E. and Borg, M. 2004. A literature review study of Information and Communication Technology as a support for frail older people living at home and their family carers. Technology and Disability, 16, 223-235.
  14. Nolan, M., Grant, G. and Keady, J. 1996. Understanding Family Care. Open University Press, Buckingham.
  15. Nolan, M., Grant, G., Keady, J. and Lundh, U. 2003. New directions for partnerships : relationship-centred care. In Nolan, M., Lundh, U., Grant, G. and Keady, J. (eds), Partnerships in Family Care. Open University Press, Maidenhead, 257-91.
  16. Qualls, S. H. 2000. Therapy with ageing families : rationale, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Aging and Mental Health, 4, 191-9.
  17. Schumacher, K. L., Stewart, B. J., Archbold, P. G., Dodd, M. J. and Dibble, S. L. 1998. Family caregiving skill : development of the concept. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30, 63-70.
  18. Thompson, C. and Briggs, M. 2000. Support for Carers of People with Alzheimer's Type Dementia, Cochrane Review, Issue 4, The Cochrane Library, Update Software, Oxford.
  19. Twigg, J. and Atkin, K. 1994. Carers Perceived : Policy and Practice in Informal Care. Open University Press, Buckingham.
  20. Woolham, J. and Frisby, B. 2002. How technology can help people feel safe at home. Journal of Dementia Care, 10, March/April, 27-9.
  21. Zarit, S. H., Gaugler, J. E. and Jarrott, S. E. 1999. Useful services for families : research findings and directions. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 165-77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MAGNUSSON, L., HANSON, E., & NOLAN, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Borås (SE)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2005-08-23
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
693-713
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2133680014
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Göteborgs Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
family caregivers, older adults, information and communication technologies, caregiver support, user-friendly technology, technology adoption barriers, practitioner education, ACTION project, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review