Cited by 8Technology Use by Older AdultsAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Extended safety and support systems for people with dementia living at home

Magnusson, Lennart, Sandman, Lars, Gustav Rosén, Karl, Hanson, Elizabeth·2014·Journal of Assistive Technologies

Abstract

Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to highlight the complexity surrounding the implementation of advanced electronic tracking, communication and emergency response technologies, namely, an extended safety and support (ESS) system for people with dementia (pwd) living at home. Results are presented from a Swedish demonstration study (2011-2012) conducted in 24 municipalities. Design/methodology/approach: – It is a descriptive intervention study with a pre-post test design. Questionnaires were administered to pwd, carers and professionals at the outset and eight months later. ESS logging data were analyzed. Findings: – ESS usage rates varied widely. A total of 650 alerts were triggered, mainly when the pwd was outdoors. Activities were reduced amongst pwd, most likely due to a progression of their disease. Carers noted that pwd were more independent than previously on those occasions when they engaged in outdoor activities. Staff considered that nearly half of pwd could remain living at home due to the ESS, compared with a third amongst carers. In total, 50 per cent of carers felt it was justified to equip their relative with an ESS without their explicit consent, compared to one in eight staff. Research limitations/implications: – A limitation is the amount of missing data and high drop- out rates. Researchers should recruit pwd earlier in their illness trajectory. A mixed-methods approach to data collection is advisable. Practical implications: – Carers played a crucial role in the adoption of ESS. Staff training/supervision about assistive devices and services is recommended. Social implications: – Overall, use of ESS for pwd living at home was not an ethical problem. Originality/value: – The study included key stakeholder groups and a detailed ethical analysis was conducted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jat-10-2014-0021

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magnusson, L., Sandman, L., Gustav Rosén, K., & Hanson, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Borås (SE)
  • Linnaeus University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Assistive Technologies
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-12-09
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
188-206
ISSN
1754-9450 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024389000
Cited by
8
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Assistive Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
dementia, home care, electronic tracking, emergency response systems, caregiver perspectives, assistive technology adoption, ethical considerations, independent living, outdoor activities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review