Cited by 145Social Robot Interaction and HRITechnology Use by Older AdultsAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The Attitudes and Perceptions of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment Toward an Assistive Robot

Wu, Ya-Huei, Cristancho-Lacroix, Victoria, Fassert, Christine, Faucounau, Véronique, de Rotrou, Jocelyne, Rigaud, Anne-Sophie·2016·Journal of Applied Gerontology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore perceived difficulties and needs of older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their attitudes toward an assistive robot to develop appropriate robot functionalities. Twenty subjects were recruited to participate in either a focus group or an interview. Findings revealed that although participants reported difficulties in managing some of their daily activities, they did not see themselves as needing assistance. Indeed, they considered that they were capable of coping with difficulties with some compensatory strategies. They therefore declared that they did not need or want a robot for the moment but that they considered it potentially useful either for themselves in the future or for other older adults suffering from frailty, loneliness, and disability. Factors underlying unwillingness to adopt an assistive robot were discussed. These issues should be carefully addressed in the design and diffusion processes of an assistive robot.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0733464813515092

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Y.-H., Cristancho-Lacroix, V., Fassert, C., Faucounau, V., de Rotrou, J., & Rigaud, A.-S.
Affiliations
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Broca hospital, Paris, France
  • Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR)
  • Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, Paris, France
Corresponding author
Wu, Ya-Huei
Venue
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2014-01-09
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
3-17
ISSN
  • 0733-4648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4523
OpenAlex
W2068857685
Cited by
145
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-TECS-0012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, older adults, assistive robots, attitudes toward robots, technology adoption, perceived need, compensatory strategies, frailty, loneliness, disability, robot design, technology diffusion
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Robotics, Self-Help Devices, Focus Groups, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review