Cited by 33LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Gay-friendly elderly care: creating space for sexual diversity in residential care by challenging the hetero norm

Open access
LEYERZAPF, H., VISSE, M., DE BEER, A., ABMA, T. A.·2018·Ageing and Society

Abstract

Studies on older lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) adults in residential care point to their discrimination, invisibility and the taboo on LGBT lifestyles, and call for development of ‘gay-friendly’ care. Yet, the literature is short on how to create inclusive residential care for older LGBT people. We aim to acquire in-depth understanding of experiences and needs of LGBT older people concerning their inclusion and participation in care settings to contribute to development of inclusive and responsive care that structurally enhances visibility, ‘voice’ and wellbeing of LGBT residents. Responsive, multi-stakeholder research using interviews, participant observations and focus groups was conducted within three elderly care homes in the Netherlands. Thematic, interpretative analysis was performed. LGBT respondents reported social exclusion and the need to feel safe and at home and be yourself. Exclusive activities for LGBT people foster personal and relational empowerment. However, heterogenous activities seem crucial in dealing with stereotypical imaging, heteronormativity and an equality-as-sameness discourse that influenced culture and daily practice in the homes and negatively affected the position of LGBT older adults. For development of gay-friendly elderly care exclusionary social norms need to be addressed. Dialogical sharing of narratives can help to empower LGBT older adults and stimulate understanding and shared responsibility between LGBT and heterosexual older people, as well as professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x16001045

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
LEYERZAPF, H., VISSE, M., DE BEER, A., & ABMA, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University of Humanistic Studies (NL)
Corresponding author
LEYERZAPF, H.
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2016-11-08
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
352-377
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2550061780
Cited by
33
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing and Society (publishedVersion)
  • University of Humanistic Studies OAI Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
LGBT older adults, residential care, nursing homes, heteronormativity, inclusive care, social exclusion, sexual diversity, empowerment, social norms, narrative sharing, care professionals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review