CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 186 of the 190 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research into practice: The influence of discourse studies on language descriptions and task design in published ELT materials

Gilmore, Alex·2015·Language Teaching
DOI 10.1017/s0261444815000269
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Discourse studies is a vast, multidisciplinary, and rapidly expanding area of research, embracing a range of approaches including discourse analysis, corpus analysis, conversation analysis, interactional sociolinguistics, critical discourse analysis, genre analysis and multimodal discourse analysis. Each approach offers its own unique perspective on discourse, focusing variably on text, context or a range of semiotic modes. Together, they provide foreign language teachers and material designers with new insights into language, and are beginning to have an observable impact on published English Language Teaching (ELT) materials. This paper examines the ways in which the four approaches with the strongest links to the ELT profession (corpus analysis, conversation analysis, discourse analysis and genre analysis) have found their way into language learning materials, and offers some suggestions on how discourse studies may influence ELT classrooms in the future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0261444815000269

Cites

186 of 186 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Young, 1994, Academic listening, 159
  2. Wajnryb R. (1996). Death, taxes and jeopardy: Systematic omissions in EFL texts, or ‘life was never meant to be an adjacency pair’. Paper presented at the 9th Educational Conference, Sydney.
  3. Ur, 1991, A course in language teaching
  4. Slade, 1986, Teaching casual conversation to adult ESL learners, Prospect, 2, 68
  5. Schmidt, 1986, Talking to learn, 237
  6. Lynch, 2004, Study listening
  7. Cunningham, 1998, Cutting edge
  8. Toffler, 1970, Future shock
  9. Anderson, 2004, Study speaking
  10. Littlejohn A. P. (1992). Why are English language teaching materials the way they are? Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University, UK. www.andrewlittlejohn.net/website/books/phd.html.
  11. Rundell M. (1996). The corpus of the future, and the future of the corpus. Talk at Exeter special conference on ‘New trends in reference science’, March 1996. web.archive.org/web/20040211202044/http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~barlow/futcrp.html.
  12. McCarthy, 2004–2006, Touchstone
  13. Zhang, 2008, The necessities, feasibilities and principles for EFL teachers to build a learner-oriented mini-corpus for practical classroom uses, Asian EFL Journal, 29, 1
  14. Scott P. J. (1987). The implications of a conversation analysis approach to request sequences for English language teaching. Unpublished MA Dissertation, University of York, UK.
  15. Hamp-Lyons, 2006, Study writing
  16. 10.3366/cor.2012.0019 · DOI
  17. Groom, 2009, Introducing corpora into the language classroom, The Language Teacher, 33, 26
  18. Allwright, 1991, Classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers
  19. Handford, 2011, Business advantage
  20. Flowerdew, 1994, Academic listening
  21. Hidalgo, 1995, Getting started: Materials writers on materials writing
  22. Baldry, 2000, Multimodality and multimediality in the distance learning age
  23. Mukherjee, 2006, Planning, gluing and painting corpora: Inside the applied corpus linguist's workshop, 205
  24. Barraja-Rohan, 1997, Beyond talk: A course in communication and conversation for intermediate adult learners
  25. 10.1093/elt/55.1.4 · DOI
  26. Bradford, 1988, Intonation in context
  27. Brazil, 1985, Handbook of discourse analysis
  28. Brazil, 1994, Pronunciation for advanced learners of English
  29. Brazil, 1994, Pronunciation for advanced learners of English
  30. Gairns, 2006–2010, Natural English
  31. Burns, 2010, Doing action research: A guide for practitioners
  32. Swales, 1990, Genre analysis
  33. Cook, 1989, Discourse
  34. Carter R. & M. McCarthy (2003). If you ever hear a native speaker, please let us know!! Plenary paper presented at the IATEFL Conference, Brighton, UK.
  35. Flowerdew, 2008, Advances in discourse studies, 115
  36. Gilmore, 2009, TESOL classroom practice series: Authenticity in adult classrooms and beyond, 155
  37. Green, 1995, Pragmatics and language learning, 1
  38. Grice, 1975, Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts
  39. Hutchby, 2008, Conversation analysis
  40. Hyland, 2009, Academic discourse
  41. Kay, 2001, Inside out
  42. Belton, 1988, Lexical naturalness in native and non-native discourse, English Language Research Journal, 2, 79
  43. Nolasco, 1987, Conversation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 47

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gilmore, A.
Venue
Language Teaching
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2015-09-08
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
506-530
ISSN
  • 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3049
DOI
10.1017/s0261444815000269
OpenAlex
W2460929853
Cited by
41
References
190
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
37.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
Locations
Language Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
discourse studies, English language teaching materials, language description, task design, corpus analysis, conversation analysis, discourse analysis, genre analysis, interactional sociolinguistics, multimodal discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, language learning materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review