The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How does having a good ear promote successful second language speech acquisition in adulthood? Introducing Auditory Precision Hypothesis-L2
Abstract
In this paper, I first provide a brief review of how scholars have conceptualized, tested, and elaborated aptitude frameworks relevant to second language (L2) speech learning. Subsequently, I introduce an emerging paradigm that assigns a fundamental role to domain-general auditory processing (i.e., having a good ear) in L1 speech acquisition and proposes that the same faculty acts as a cornerstone of L2 speech learning (i.e., the Auditory Precision Hypothesis-L2). This hypothesis predicts that learners with more precise auditory processing ability will be able to make the most of every input opportunity, which will result in more advanced L2 speech proficiency. To close, I will provide suggestions on how scholars can assess L2 students’ auditory processing ability (e.g., our team's offline test deposited at L2 Speech Tools for Researchers & Teachers [ http://sla-speech-tools.com/ ]) and discuss how the results can be used to maximize learners’ L2 speech learning opportunities via optimal, profile-matched training programs (e.g., explicit vs. incidental training; naturalistic vs. classroom learning; phonetic vs. auditory training).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It must be pointed out that L2 aptitude has largely been studied in relation to L2 learning success, yet its role in L2 pronunciation learning remains unexplored (Chalmers et al., 2021;Li, 2019;Saito, 2023).”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Saito, 2023
In the citing paper
“Recent empirical research indicates that linking aptitude to L2 pronunciation is still relatively sparse and methodologically heterogeneous (Saito, 2023;Trofimovich et al., 2015).”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Saito, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1533 · Cited by 2,291
Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training
Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S. L., & Tallal, P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5245.77 · Cited by 1,000
Anvari, S. H., Trainor, L. J., Woodside, J., & Levy, B. A. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00124-8 · Cited by 670
THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON INSTRUCTED L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION
Lee, A. H., & Lyster, R. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000194 · Cited by 133
Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R. (2013) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12001 · Cited by 117
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 99
- Moore, 2012, An introduction to the psychology of hearing
- 10.1177/0956797618763090 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bht311 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.3593366 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms11070 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01186-3 · DOI
- 10.1177/0023830909349151 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002731 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12011 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcpp.12139 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0128839 · DOI
- 10.1044/jshr.3604.842 · DOI
- Saito, in press-b, Incidental and multimodal high variability phonetic training: Potential, limits, and future directions, Language Learning
- 10.1017/9781108886901.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/lang.12345 · DOI
- Hornickel, 2013, Unstable representation of sound: A biological marker of dyslexia, Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 3500, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4205-12.2013 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1366728918000895 · DOI
- 10.1111/desc.12836 · DOI
- 10.1002/tesq.3120 · DOI
- 10.1121/10.0003330 · DOI
- Saito, in press-c, Training auditory processing promotes second language speech acquisition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- 10.1037/xge0000688 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12000 · DOI
- 10.1177/0265532217703433 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1366728915000450 · DOI
- Carroll, 1959, Modern language aptitude test
- 10.1073/pnas.1204319109 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12322 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263117000183 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.3506351 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00046-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263118000256 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263115000248 · DOI
- Saito, in press-a, Does domain-general auditory processing uniquely explain the outcomes of second language speech acquisition, even once cognitive and demographic variables are accounted for?, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
- 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104168 · DOI
- Skehan, 2016, Cognitive individual differences in L2 processing and acquisition, 15
- 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105196 · DOI
- Brazil, 1997, The communicative value of intonation in English book
- 10.1152/jn.00923.2011 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00198-1 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716420000491 · DOI
- 10.1891/1945-8959.11.1.45 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.1912375 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263104040021 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00485.x · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12161 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263112000666 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/ams066 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263121000012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1044/jslhr.4205.1061 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.system.2007.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1017/S027226311500042X · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/amu024 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263106060013 · DOI
- 10.1006/jpho.2002.0174 · DOI
- 10.1017/S027226310404001X · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01192.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9922.00147 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9781118346952.ch20 · DOI
- 10.1017/S027226310808073X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104481 · DOI
- 10.1111/desc.12530 · DOI
- 10.1080/16513860600568573 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2013.0090 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263120000467 · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230584587_11 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263120000649 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12244 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01765.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263112000022 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn3836 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716418000152 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263117000432 · DOI
- Gabay, 2015, Incidental auditory category learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1124
- 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes · DOI
- 10.1162/0898929042568541 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0267190521000015 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0147320 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90012-M · DOI
- Penner, 2001, Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic, and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition, 269
- 10.1073/pnas.1713975115 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.012 · DOI
- 10.1177/0267658320978493 · DOI
- Saito, in press-e, Domain-general auditory processing as a conceptual and measurement framework for second language speech learning aptitude: A test-retest reliability study, Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Saito, in press-d, Roles of domain-general auditory processing in spoken second-language vocabulary attainment in adulthood, Applied Psycholinguistics
- 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00955.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.02.004 · DOI
- Meara, 2005, LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual
- 10.1016/j.heares.2006.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12447 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108589789.020 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barra–García, C. F., Véliz-Campos, M., Figueroa Candia, M. A., Pereira-Reyes, Y., & Kartsevski Dune, M. (2026) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2026.55.04
Metadata
- Authors
- Saito, K.
- Venue
- Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2023-01-25
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 522-538
- ISSN
- 0261-4448
- 1475-3049
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Spencer Foundation (202100074)
- Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2019-039)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S013024/1)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review