Cited by 223Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionLanguage Development and Disorders

Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with autism spectrum disorders

Open access
Russo, N.M., Skoe, E., Trommer, B., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., Bradlow, A., Kraus, N.·2008·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective Deficient prosody is a hallmark of the pragmatic (socially contextualized) language impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Prosody communicates emotion and intention and is conveyed through acoustic cues such as pitch contour. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the subcortical representations of prosodic speech in children with ASD.Methods Using passively evoked brainstem responses to speech syllables with descending and ascending pitch contours, we examined sensory encoding of pitch in children with ASD who had normal intelligence and hearing and were age-matched with typically developing (TD) control children.Results We found that some children on the autism spectrum show deficient pitch tracking (evidenced by increased Frequency and Slope Errors and reduced phase locking) compared with TD children.Conclusions This is the first demonstration of subcortical involvement in prosody encoding deficits in this population of children.Significance Our findings may have implications for diagnostic and remediation strategies in a subset of children with ASD and open up an avenue for future investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.108

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with ASD show atypical patterns of brainstem activity in response to complex stimuli compared with simple stimuli.

    “even at the level of the brainstem, individuals with ASD show atypical patterns of activity in response to complex stimuli when compared with simple stimuli (Russo et al., 2009; Russo et al., 2008)”
  • Models of autism have posited brainstem abnormalities, based on early ontogeny of brainstem development and evidence of increased prevalence of putative ASD cases associated with early exposure to teratogens affecting brainstem development.

    “Noting the early ontogeny of brainstem development and evidence of increased prevalence of putative ASD cases associated with early exposure to teratogens affecting brainstem development (95), models of autism have posited brainstem abnormalities (66).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hoelzley PD. Communication potentiating sounds: Developing channels of communication with autistic children through psychobiological responses to novel sound stimuli. Canadian Journal of Music Therapy. 1993;1:54–76. [Google Scholar]
  2. Semel E, Wiig EH, Secord WA. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. 4th ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment Inc.; 2003. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russo, N. M., Skoe, E., Trommer, B., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., Bradlow, A., & Kraus, N.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Kraus, N.
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
119
Issue
8
Pages
1720-1731
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059629560
Cited by
223
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01-DC01510, R01DC001510)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06RR012087)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, pitch tracking, prosody, brainstem responses, subcortical auditory processing, pitch contour, phase locking, children, speech perception, pragmatic language impairment
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Perceptual Disorders, Autistic Disorder, Brain Stem, Child, Child Language, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Language Tests, Male, Pitch Perception, Psychophysics, Speech, Reproducibility of Results, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review