The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: Recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies
Abstract
Objectives:Health technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly an international activity, and HTA agencies collaborate to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort. However, the sharing of the results from HTAs raises questions about their generalizability; namely, are the results of an HTA undertaken in one country relevant to another? Methods:This study presents recommendations for increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations. They represent an important component of HTAs and are commonly thought to have limited generalizability. Results:Recommendations are given for studies using patient-level data (i.e., evaluations conducted alongside clinical trials) and for studies using decision analytic modeling. Conclusions:If implemented, the recommendations would increase the value for investments in HTA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE)
Claxton, K., Sculpher, M., & Drummond, M. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09832-x · Cited by 456
Self-citationAdes, A. E., & Cliffe, S. (2002) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/027298902400448920 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 · Cited by 1,998
Self-citationConsolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., Loder, E., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f1049 · Cited by 1,776
Self-citationA catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research
Simera, I., Moher, D., Hoey, J., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02234.x · Cited by 1,047
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., et al. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008 · Cited by 847
Self-citationConsolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.010 · Cited by 657
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Drummond, M., Manca, A., & Sculpher, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-171
- ISSN
- 0266-4623 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6348
- OpenAlex
- W2119475196
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: Recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0266462305050221
- The paper
- Drummond, M., Manca, A., & Sculpher, M. (2005). Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: Recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462305050221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
