Cited by 75Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Density and biomass of large herbivores and other mammals in a dry tropical forest, western Thailand

Srikosamatara, Sompoad·1993·Journal of Tropical Ecology

Abstract

ABSTRACT Density and biomass of four ungulate species, elephant (Elephas maximus) and seven other mammal species were estimated in an area of about 50 km2in a dry tropical forest in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, western Thailand. Density estimations employed line transects, using either direct sightings or indirect signs. Total biomass of these ungulates and elephant was 1450 kg km–2which was lower than that found in a well protected and managed area of similar forest, Nagarahole National Park, in India. This is due to the intensive poaching activity and the lack of wildlife management in this study site. Three species of ungulate, banteng (Bos javanicus), gaur (Bos gaurus) and sambar deer (Cervus unicolor), contributed over 70% of the estimated herbivore biomass. This situation is similar to that found in other parts of Asia. The high biomass of a subterranean mammal,Cannomys badius, has not been documented elsewhere in Asia; this species probably influences the forest dynamics and ecology of small carnivores in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s026646740000691x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The population density of B. gaurus in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, western Thailand, was 1.8 (1.3-2.3, 95% CI) in 1998.

    “The population density in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, western Thailand, was reported to be 1.8 (1.3-2.3,95% CI) in 1998 (Srikosamatara 1993).”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Srikosamatara 1993

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Srikosamatara, S.
Affiliations
Mahidol University (TH)
Corresponding author
Srikosamatara, Sompoad
Venue
Journal of Tropical Ecology
Published
1993-02
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
33-43
ISSN
  • 0266-4674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7831
OpenAlex
W2106800768
Cited by
75
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Tropical Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
ungulate density, tropical dry forest, Asian elephant, banteng, Bos javanicus, gaur, Bos gaurus, sambar deer, Cervus unicolor, poaching, wildlife management, subterranean mammals, forest dynamics, Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review