The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AUDIENCE, AUTHORSHIP, AND ARTIFACT: THE EMERGENT SEMIOTICS OF WEB 2.0
Abstract
The second-generation Web has amplified and extended new ways of online communication. Millions of people now interact through blogs, collaborate through wikis, play multiplayer games, publish podcasts and video, build relationships through social network sites, and evaluate all the above forms of communication through feedback and ranking mechanisms. This article analyzes the emergent semiotics of what has been called Web 2.0 by focusing on three critical elements of language use and communication: audience, authorship, and artifact. Drawing on recent theoretical and empirical work, this article considers the significance of transformations in these three areas for both research and teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/720466 · Cited by 8,470
Marxism and the philosophy of language
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,967
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Giles, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/438900a · Cited by 1,978
Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide
Warschauer, M. (2003) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001 · Cited by 1,825
Self-citationTechnology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1633 · Cited by 1,738
Weaving the Web: the original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3934 · Cited by 1,347
Handbook of Research on New Literacies
(2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410618894 · Cited by 1,138
Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology
Bender, T. K., & Landow, G. P. (1992) · Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature · doi:10.2307/1347143 · Cited by 1,077
Blogs, wikis, podcasts and other powerful Web tools for classrooms
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-0457 · Cited by 1,011
Cited by
Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming
THORNE, S. L., BLACK, R. W., & SYKES, J. M. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x · Cited by 516
A comparative study of Facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills
Dizon, G. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1266369 · Cited by 83
Effects of Peer E-Feedback on Turkish EFL Students' Writing Performance
Ciftci, H., & Kocoglu, Z. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.46.1.c · Cited by 68
Digital Gaming in L2 Teaching and Learning
Reinhardt, J. (2017) · The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/9781118914069.ch14 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 0267-1905 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6356
- OpenAlex
- W2162486179
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 16.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AUDIENCE, AUTHORSHIP, AND ARTIFACT: THE EMERGENT SEMIOTICS OF WEB 2.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0267190508070013
- The paper
- Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). AUDIENCE, AUTHORSHIP, AND ARTIFACT: THE EMERGENT SEMIOTICS OF WEB 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190508070013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.