The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide
Abstract
From the Publisher: Much discussion of new technologies and social equality has focused on the oversimplified notion of a digital divide. Technology and Social Inclusion moves beyond the limited view of haves and have-nots to analyze the different forms of access to information and communication technologies. Drawing on theory from political science, economics, sociology, psychology, communications, education, and linguistics, the book examines the ways in which differing access to technology contributes to social and economic stratification or inclusion. The book takes a global perspective, presenting case studies from developed and developing countries, including Brazil, China, Egypt, India, and the United States. A central premise is that, in today's society, the ability to access, adapt, and create knowledge using information and communication technologies is critical to social inclusion. This focus on social inclusion shifts the discussion of the digital divide from gaps to be overcome by providing equipment to social development challenges to be addressed through the effective integration of technology into communities, institutions, and societies. What is most important is not so much the physical availability of computers and the Internet but rather people's ability to make use of those technologies to engage in meaningful social practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The digital divide shifts to differences in usage
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444813487959 · Cited by 1,733
Identity, language learning, and social change
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000309 · Cited by 1,168
Impact of digital surge during COVID-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice
De’, R., Pandey, N., & Pal, A. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171 · Cited by 1,110
New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x09349791 · Cited by 1,047
The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015) · Communication and Information Technologies Annual · doi:10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002 · Cited by 1,022
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 41-1633-41-1633
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1539142549
- Cited by
- 1,738
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-1633
- The paper
- Technology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide. (2003). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.