Cited by 162EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

Tasks Versus Conditions: Two Perspectives on Task Research and Their Implications for Pedagogy

Skehan, Peter·2016·Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Abstract

This chapter explores the contrast between the effects on second language performance of tasks and task characteristics, on the one hand, and the conditions under which tasks are done, on the other. The first major section explores the evidence on this issue and proposes that the impact of conditions such as pretask planning, task repetition, and posttask activities is greater and more consistent than the impact of tasks and features such as time perspective or number of elements. The second major section explores the theoretical accounts that have been proposed regarding tasks and conditions. It is suggested that deductive accounts have, so far, only had limited success regarding the use of tasks, but that psycholinguistic models of speaking do provide a looser but more useful framework to account for the effects of conditions. It is also suggested that an important difference between tasks and conditions concerns the tension between constraint and flexibility in performance and that the flexibility provided by task conditions is an important component in the more dependable results they have generated. Finally, pedagogic implications are discussed linking task conditions to the methodological choices that are available to teachers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0267190515000100

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skehan (2016) makes a clear distinction between design and implementation options.

    “Skehan (2016) makes a clear distinction between design and implementation options.”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Skehan (2016)

  • Skehan concludes that design features do not generate consistency or robust generalizations and that putative manipulations of task complexity may not in reality produce different levels of complexity.

    “While he does not reject the impact that design features can have on performance, he concludes that “they do not generate consistency or robust generalizations” (p.37) and that “putative manipulations of task complexity may not in reality produce different levels of complexity” (p.40)”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Skehan (2016)

  • Studies investigating task conditions such as pre-task planning have produced more consistent results than studies of design features.

    “and then goes on to argue that studies that have investigated the effect of task conditionssuch as pre-task planning -have produced more consistent results [2].”

    From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Skehan (2016)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skehan, P.
Affiliations
St. Mary's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Skehan, Peter
Venue
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
Published
2016-03
Volume
36
Pages
34-49
ISSN
  • 0267-1905 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6356
OpenAlex
W2335363146
Cited by
162
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
106.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
task-based language teaching, task conditions, second language performance, task characteristics, task repetition, task-based language assessment, educational implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review