Cited by 1,147EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance

Open access
Foster, Pauline, Skehan, Peter·1996·Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

This study focuses on the impact of different variables on the nature of language performance in the context of task-based instruction. Characteristics of tasks are discussed, and then a framework is offered that can organize the nature of task-based instruction and relevant research. The framework is used to generate predictions regarding the effects of three different tasks (Personal Information Exchange, Narrative, and Decision-Making) and three different implementation conditions for each task (unplanned, planned but without detail, detailed planning) on the variables of fluency, complexity, and accuracy. The study reports strong effects of planning on fluency and clear effects also on complexity, with a linear relationship between degree of planning and degree of complexity. However, a more complex relationship was discovered between planning and accuracy, with the most accurate performance produced by the less detailed planners. In addition, interactions were found between task type and planning conditions, such that the effects of planning were greater with the Narrative and Decision-Making tasks than with the Personal Information Exchange task. The results are discussed in terms of an attentional model of learning and performance and highlight the importance of tradeoff effects between the goals of complexity and accuracy in the context of the use of limited capacity attentional resources. The study contributes to the development of cognitive models of second language performance and addresses a number of pedagogic issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263100015047

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 37 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    The no planning group always produced the least fluency.

    “Regarding the fluency measures of pauses and silence, the no planning group always produced the least fluency.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    General task familiarity does not have an influence on the level of complexity achieved.

    “We can conclude, therefore (and this is interesting in itself), that general task familiarity does not have an influence on the level of complexity achieved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Thames Valley University

    Planning has strong effects on fluency.

    “The study reports strong effects of planning on fluency”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    For the Personal and Decision tasks, variation in planning produced little difference in fluency.

    “For the Personal and Decision tasks variation in planning produced little difference.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Thames Valley University

    Interactions were found between task type and planning conditions, such that the effects of planning were greater with the Narrative and Decision-Making tasks than with the Personal Information Exchange task.

    “interactions were found between task type and planning conditions, such that the effects of planning were greater with the Narrative and Decision-Making tasks than with the Personal Information Exchange task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 61
  • May combine two claims. 52
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    A focus on form is very important if language development is to occur.

    “a focus on form (rather than a focus on forms, i.e., form in general rather than any form in particular) is very important if language development is to occur (Doughty, 1991)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Doughty, 1991 source

      The Saliency and Conclusion sections report that focus on form helped learners acquire English relativization. But the Comprehension and Rule Internalization section says both the meaning-oriented and rule-oriented treatments facilitated acquisition, so the paper does not establish that focus on form, rather than focus on forms, is necessary for language development. Page numbers are not available in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    Pauses and total silence achieved significance for all three tasks, with very high levels achieved for the Narrative and Decision tasks.

    “The figures in Table 6 indicate that pauses and total silence achieved significance for all three tasks, with very high levels achieved for the Narrative and Decision tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    The detailed planners produced a level of accuracy greater than the no planning condition for the Personal and Decision tasks, but the no planning condition produced more accurate performance than detailed planning in the Narrative task.

    “In addition, the detailed planners produced a level of accuracy that was greater than the no planning condition for the Personal and Decision tasks, but the no planning condition produced more accurate performance than detailed planning in the Narrative task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    No significant differences were found for greater variety of present-tense usage, modals, or conditionals.

    “No significant differences were found for greater variety of present-tense usage (i.e., forms other than the simple present), modals, or conditionals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    There are significant differences in the proportion of error-free clauses used under the different planning conditions, but these differences show a complex pattern.

    “The central finding here is that there are significant differences in the proportion of error-free clauses that were used under the different planning conditions, but these differences show a complex pattern.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Thames Valley University

    The relationship between planning and accuracy is more complex, with the most accurate performance produced by the less detailed planners.

    “a more complex relationship was discovered between planning and accuracy, with the most accurate performance produced by the less detailed planners.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    For complexity, the detailed planners always produced significantly greater complexity than the undetailed planners, who in turn outperformed the no planning group.

    “The findings for complexity, in contrast, essentially supported Hypothesis 5 across the tasks, with the detailed planners always producing significantly greater complexity than the undetailed planners, who in turn outperformed the no planning group (with only the comparison for the no planners vs. the undetailed planners failing to reach significance).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    For the Personal and Decision tasks, there was only an overall effect for planning versus no planning, with little difference between the two planning conditions.

    “for the Personal and Decision tasks there was only an overall effect for planning versus no planning, the results showing little difference between the two planning conditions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    For the Decision task, the no planning condition was significantly different from the two planning conditions, but the two types of planning did not produce significantly different effects.

    “The F ratio of 5.73 for the Decision task is significant at the .01level, with Duncan range tests demonstrating that the no planning condition was significantly different from the two planning conditions but that the two types of planning did not produce significantly different effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    The syntactic variety results patterned similarly to the fluency measures, with little difference between the two planning conditions.

    “The syntactic variety results, which provided only limited support for the more specific Hypothesis 3, patterned similarly to the fluency measures, with little difference between the two planning conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    Detailed planning produced significantly more subordination than undetailed planning, which in turn produced significantly more subordination than no planning.

    “The results in Table 8 suggest a very strong effect for the planning condition: Detailed planning produced significantly more subordination than undetailed planning, which in turn produced significantly more subordination than no planning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The Decision task's accuracy level is comparable to that obtained with the Personal task and above that obtained for the Narrative task.

    “The accuracy level, it will be recalled, is comparable to that obtained with the Personal task (and above that obtained for the Narrative task).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The planning effect on fluency is monotonic for the Narrative task, but there is only a binary distinction for the other two tasks (detailed and undetailed conditions do not lead to different patterns of pausing and total silence).

    “This effect is of a monotonic nature for the Narrative task, but there is only a binary distinction for the other two tasks (i.e., the detailed and undetailed conditions do not lead to different patterns of pausing and total silence).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    Planning produces more repetitions/hesitations and replacements in the Decision task, rendering the discourse, in one sense, less fluent.

    “Planning produces more of these, rendering the discourse, in one sense, less fluent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    The measures of syntactic variety were not strong and provide no clear support for Hypothesis 6.

    “The measures of syntactic variety were not strong, in any sense, and provide no clear support for Hypothesis 6.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The changes in accuracy were least for the Narrative task, with even a reduction of accuracy level for the detailed versus the undetailed planners.

    “It is relevant, in this respect, that the changes in accuracy were least for this task, with even a reduction of accuracy level for the detailed versus the undetailed planners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Consistent with Crookes (1989), complexity became the preeminent goal under detailed planning, but accuracy suffered to some degree, reducing to a point midway between the undetailed and nonplanning conditions for the Personal task, below the no planning conditions for the Narrative task, and only slightly inferior to the undetailed planning for the Decision task.

    “Consistent with Crookes (1989), complexity became the preeminent goal, but accuracy suffered to some degree, reducing to a point midway between the undetailed and nonplanning conditions for the Personal task, below the no planning conditions for the Narrative task, and only slightly inferior to the undetailed planning for the Decision task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes (1989) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The Personal and Decision tasks lead on average error (proportions 0.70 and 0.69), whereas the Narrative task produces the lowest overall accuracy level (0.61).

    “Here, the Personal and Decision tasks lead (average error proportions of 0.70 and 0.69, respectively), whereas the Narrative task produces the lowest overall accuracy level (0.61).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The least complex language is used with the Personal task (1.18 clauses per c-unit), the Decision task produces more complex language (1.32), and the Narrative task produces the most complex language of all (1.44).

    “The least complex language is used with the Personal task (1.18 clauses per c-unit), the Decision task produces more complex language (1.32), and the Narrative task produces the most complex language of all (1.44).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    Hypothesis 5 is only supported to a limited degree and the results obtained reveal a more complex picture than was predicted.

    “we have to conclude that Hypothesis 5 is only supported to a limited degree and that the results obtained reveal a more complex picture than was predicted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The Decision task's complexity is higher than the Personal task, never as great as the Narrative task, and shows a more marked effect for planning.

    “Complexity, in contrast, although never as great as the Narrative task, is higher than the Personal task and shows a more marked effect for planning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    There is an accuracy effect in the present study, even though statistically it is not as strong as that for complexity or fluency.

    “So it is already striking that there is an accuracy effect in the present study, even though statistically it is not as strong as that for complexity or fluency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § (Received 25 August 1995) NOTES

    This pattern of results has been replicated in a subsequent study (Foster & Skehan, 1996).

    “This pattern of results has been replicated in a subsequent study (Foster & Skehan, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foster & Skehan, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    The fluency measures for the Personal task reduced by less than those for the Decision task and, most of all, the Narrative.

    “The fluency measures for the Personal task reduced by less than do those for the Decision task and, most of all, the Narrative”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The Personal task generates a greater degree of accuracy without achieving much complexity.

    “The Personal task generates a greater degree of accuracy without achieving much complexity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    With accuracy, the Personal task and the Decision task produce clear (and fairly similar) gains, whereas the degree of improvement for the Narrative task is less marked.

    “With accuracy, the Personal task and the Decision task produce clear (and fairly similar) gains, whereas the degree of improvement for the Narrative task is less marked.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Communicational goal

    If only base forms are used, there would seem to be little impetus for interlanguage change to occur through the use of more challenging forms.

    “If only base forms are used, such as simple present or simple past tenses, there would seem to be little impetus for interlanguage change to occur through the use of more challenging forms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Tasks

    The Personal task should be easiest and most accessible to learners.

    “This characterization suggests that the Personal task should be easiest and most accessible to learners”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Design

    The data set, based on 31 subjects, is otherwise complete.

    “The data set, based on 31 subjects, is otherwise complete.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Tasks

    The Decision-Making task placed the heaviest cognitive load upon the subject and allowed the least attentional resources to be given to language form.

    “This task was considered to place the heaviest cognitive load upon the subject and to allow the least attentional resources to be given to language form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Tasks

    The Narrative task is easier than the Decision task.

    “On balance, then, the Narrative task is judged to be easier than the Decision task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    Posttask activities with a strong focus on form can have a beneficial effect on earlier task performance, provided that learners themselves make the connection between task completion and subsequent posttask activity.

    “posttask activities with a strong focus on form can have a beneficial effect on (earlier) task performance itself, provided that learners themselves make the connection between task completion and subsequent posttask activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites J.Willis & Willis, 1988

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    The c-unit is a more sensitive measure for spoken language than the T-unit because it allows for ellipsis.

    “The c-unit, defined by Brock (1986) as an independent utterance providing referential or pragmatic meaning, allows for ellipsis and is thus a more sensitive measure for the spoken language.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brock (1986) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Communicational goal

    Error-free clauses generalize across a range of different specific forms and are not dependent on any one of them.

    “Clauses would also generalize across a range of different specific forms and not be dependent on any one of them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § Tasks

    The choice of the three task types was based on an analysis of tasks commonly used in current English language teaching textbooks.

    “The choice of these types was based on an analysis of tasks commonly used in current English language teaching textbooks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Tasks

    The Narrative and Decision tasks are similar to one another in that they provide relatively low familiarity but a high computational load.

    “the Narrative and Decision tasks are similar to one another in that they provide relatively low familiarity but a high computational load.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    Accuracy concerns control at a particular interlanguage level.

    “Accuracy, in contrast, concerns control at a particular interlanguage level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § RESULTS

    These comparisons do not attain significance in specific pairwise comparisons, but the trend in the results is clear.

    “These comparisons do not attain significance in specific pairwise comparisons, but the trend in the results is clear.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Communicational goal

    Complexity emphasizes the organization of what is said and draws attention to progressively more elaborate language and greater variety of syntactic patterning.

    “Complexity emphasizes the organization of what is said and draws attention to the progressively more elaborate language that may be used, as well as a greater variety of syntactic patterning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    Accuracy may not reflect complexity of language and may be the result of relatively simple, well-controlled forms being used to achieve a more target-like use of language.

    “a measure of accuracy may not reflect complexity of language and may be the result of relatively simple, well-controlled forms being used to achieve a more target-like use of language.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    Crookes (1989) relied principally on specific measures, and this may have been a factor in the lack of significance reported.

    “Crookes (1989) relied principally on specific measures (target-like use of the article system and of plural -s), and this may have been a factor in the lack of significance reported.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes (1989) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Communicational goal

    Fluency reflects the effectiveness of the planning process and the way propositions can be orchestrated into effective, ongoing discourse.

    “Fluency also reflects the effectiveness of the planning process and the way propositions can be orchestrated into effective, ongoing discourse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    Accuracy, as a reflection of a focus on form, may have a more conservative orientation, whereas complexity may capture a greater willingness to experiment and to take risks.

    “accuracy, as a reflection of a focus on form, may have a more conservative orientation, whereas complexity may capture a greater willingness to experiment and to take risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Communicational goal

    Complexity is likely to reflect a willingness to engage in restructuring as more complex subsystems of language are developed.

    “Complexity is likely to reflect a willingness, on the learner's part, to engage in restructuring as more complex subsys-terns of language are developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Thames Valley University

    In second language learning, the main competition for attentional resources is between meaning and form, with first priority generally being given to meaning.

    “the main competition for attentional resources is between meaning and form, with first priority generally being given to meaning (VanPatten, 1990).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites VanPatten, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Design

    In each experimental group, half the subjects were randomly assigned the undetailed planning condition and half the detailed planning condition.

    “The experimental groups were each divided into two, and in each case half the subjects were randomly assigned the undetailed planning condition and half the detailed planning condition (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    Error-free clauses should produce good intersubject variation.

    “such a measure should produce good intersubject variation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    Fluency reflects the primacy of meaning and the capacity to cope with real-time communication.

    “Skehan (1992Skehan ( , 1996)), following Schmidt (1990), takes fluency to reflect the primacy of meaning and the capacity to cope with real-time communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Skehan, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Skehan, 1996 source
    • cites Schmidt, 1990 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § RESULTS

    Any trend toward a practice effect on errors does not influence the conclusions to be drawn later.

    “In any case, given the counterbalanced nature of the research design, any trend toward a practice effect on errors does not influence the conclusions to be drawn later.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: If there was a practice effect of consistent strength over the three visits of the study, the Personal Information Exchange task, always completed in the second week, would be affected to the same degree as the averaged performance on the other two tasks.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    In Crookes (1989), standard deviations for the measures reported tended to be higher for the planning groups for the complexity measures, suggesting that some subjects interpreted the planning instructions in different ways.

    “the standard deviations for the measures reported tended to be higher for the planning groups for the complexity measures, suggesting that some subjects interpreted the planning instructions in different ways”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes (1989) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    Complexity is likely to be associated with greater risk-taking to the extent that actual performances may be exploited to use forms closer to the cutting edge of interlanguage development.

    “It is also likely to be associated with greater risktaking to the extent that actual performances may be exploited to use forms closer to the cutting edge of interlanguage development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Tasks

    The Decision-Making task was considered most likely to require the use of complex language.

    “the process of trying to reach an agreement on a series of difficult questions was considered most likely to require the use of complex language.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    The calculation of error-free clauses has merit as a measure of accuracy.

    “the calculation of error-free clauses has merit”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    Measures of syntactic variety (tense, aspect, voice, modality) reflect a capacity to draw upon a greater variety of language.

    “one can also try to measure the range of syntactic forms used, as these reflect a capacity to draw upon a greater variety of language.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Thames Valley University

    Transacting tasks will push forward interlanguage development because the demands that tasks make will engage the very processes that lead to acquisition.

    “transacting tasks will push forward interlanguage development because the demands that tasks make will engage the very processes that lead to acquisition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    General measures are likely to be more sensitive to differences in experimental conditions, detecting weaker effects because these are likely to be based on more variance.

    “such measures are likely to be more sensitive to differences in experimental conditions, detecting weaker effects because these are likely to be based on more variance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Design

    Subjects were protected from any special pressure that selection for recording might have had upon their performance.

    “In this way, subjects were protected from any special pressure that selection for recording might have had upon their performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Communicational goal

    Complexity connects with change and opportunities for development and growth in the interlanguage system.

    “Complexity, in other words, connects with change and the opportunities for development and growth in the interlanguage system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Design

    To combat any practice effect, each of the controls and each of the experimental groups did the tasks in a different order.

    “To combat any practice effect, each of the controls and each of the experimental groups did the tasks in a different order (see Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Tasks

    The Personal Information Exchange task required relatively simple linguistic forms to be used.

    “the nature of the task would require relatively simple linguistic forms to be used.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    Fluency may prioritize lexicalized language and the way learners avoid rule-based, constructed language, instead preferring more idiom-based language to enable communication to proceed more smoothly.

    “It may therefore prioritize lexicalized language (Ellis, 1987) and the way learners, during tasks, avoid rule-based, constructed language, instead preferring to use more idiom-based language (Sinclair, 1991) to enable communication to proceed more smoothly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ellis, 1987 source
    • cites Sinclair, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § Thames Valley University

    Decisions to attend to one area are usually made at the expense of attending to another.

    “decisions to attend to one area are usually made at the expense of attending to another.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    Ellis (1987) found that accuracy on the regular (rule-governed) form of the past tense declined according to lack of planned discourse being engaged, whereas performance on the irregular (lexical) past form was hardly affected by these conditions.

    “Ellis (1987) found that accuracy on the regular (rule-governed) form of the past tense declined according to lack of planned discourse being engaged, whereas performance on the irregular (lexical) past form was hardly affected by these conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis (1987) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Tasks

    The Personal Information Exchange task required the least cognitive effort and allowed the greatest attention to language form.

    “it was seen as requiring the least cognitive effort and allowing the greatest attention to language form.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Thames Valley University

    Attention and noticing are central for second language development.

    “attention and noticing are central for second language development”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt, 1990 source
    • cites Schmidt, 1994

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    A focus on form makes noticing more likely and enables language teaching goals of accuracy and complexity to be pursued more effectively.

    “such a focus makes noticing more likely and also enables language teaching goals of accuracy and complexity (Skehan, 1992) to be pursued more effectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Skehan, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Communicational goal

    Crookes (1989) reported that providing subjects with pretask planning time leads to greater complexity and variety of language but no significant increases in accuracy.

    “Crookes (1989) reported a study in which providing subjects with pretask planning time leads to greater complexity and variety of language but no significant increases in accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes (1989) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Tasks

    The Narrative task gave scope for more complex language but demanded greater cognitive effort, therefore allowing less attention to be devoted to form.

    “It was seen as giving scope for more complex language but also demanding greater cognitive effort, therefore allowing less attention to be devoted to form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The goals of complexity and accuracy compete for limited information processing resources, and what is achievable depends on the precise allocational decisions made.

    “What seems to be happening is that the goals of complexity and accuracy compete for limited information processing resources and that what is achievable depends on the precise allocational decisions made.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § (Received 25 August 1995) NOTES

    When the lower level of his performance was noticed, his results were removed from the data set.

    “When the lower level of his performance was noticed, his results were removed from the data set.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § CONCLUSION

    Midtask manipulations may also influence the balance among the goals of fluency, complexity, and accuracy.

    “The framework also suggests that midtask manipulations may also influence the balance among the goals of fluency, complexity, and accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § CONCLUSION

    These conclusions are based on just three tasks.

    “But these conclusions are based on just three tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § (Received 25 August 1995) NOTES

    One subject had to be discarded when it was realized that the college had not applied its own selection policy to him.

    “Subsequently, one subject had to be discarded when it was realized that the college had not applied its own selection policy to him.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    Crookes' tasks were devices for the transmission of neutral and arbitrary information.

    “They were, quite simply, devices for the transmission of neutral and arbitrary information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes' (1989) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The use of repetitions and replacements indicates naturalness of discourse.

    “But we interpret this finding to suggest naturalness of discourse, in that native speakers also engage in a greater use of such linguistic behaviors to enable them to cope with the problem of real-time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § (Received 25 August 1995) NOTES

    Piloting reduced the risk of basing the research project on unpopular and unproductive tasks.

    “In this way, the risk of basing the research project on unpopular and unproductive tasks was reduced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    Crookes (1989) seemed to be testing for specific increases in accuracy, whereas the present study was more interested in detecting a more generalized accuracy effect.

    “Crookes (1989) seemed to be testing for specific increases in accuracy, whereas we were more interested in detecting a more generalized accuracy effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes (1989) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    A generally similar pattern of results is reported in Alvarez-Ossario (1994).

    “A generally similar pattern of results is reported in Alvarez-Ossario (1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alvarez-Ossario (1994)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § (Received 25 August 1995) NOTES

    Even so, it must be borne in mind that the effect, in such a case, was on accuracy, not on complexity.

    “Even so, it must be borne in mind that the effect, in such a case, was on accuracy, not on complexity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Crookes (1989) looked for specific effects on a wide range of variables, whereas the present study used a more global measure based on all contributory influences on error and correctness.

    “Crookes (1989) looked for specific effects on a wide range of variables, whereas the present study used a more global measure based on all contributory influences on error and correctness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes (1989) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § DISCUSSION

    Crookes' (1989) tasks, such as a LEGO assembly, were classroom tasks and did not have much connection with the subjects' real lives.

    “Crookes' (1989) tasks, for example, a LEGO assembly, were classroom tasks and did not have much connection with the subjects' real lives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes' (1989) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § (Received 25 August 1995) NOTES

    Even if there were an effect that has not been detected in the present study, the underlying cause may be task familiarity, or simply improvements in proficiency over time.

    “In any case here, even if there were an effect that has not been detected in the present study, the underlying cause may be task familiarity, or simply improvements in proficiency over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    Subjects under the unplanned condition, who would benefit most from techniques to protect time for ongoing planning, are unable to exploit them.

    “In other words, it may be that the subjects under the unplanned condition, who would benefit most from the use of techniques to protect time for ongoing planning, are unable to exploit them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § (Received 25 August 1995) NOTES

    The students were following courses of instruction, and it may be that this instruction was having an effect.

    “The students were following courses of instruction, and it may be that this instruction was having an effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The use of a dependent variable such as error-free clauses is more sensitive to an overall accuracy effect.

    “It may simply be, therefore, that the use of a dependent variable such as error-free clauses is more sensitive to an overall accuracy effect, a proposal perhaps consistent with the weaker finding in this area than for complexity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    Detailed planning seemed to lead to a level of pressure too great for subjects to cope with all aspects of performance, with the result that prioritizing decisions had to be made.

    “But the next condition, detailed planning, seemed to lead to a level of pressure too great for subjects to cope with all aspects of performance, with the result that prioritizing decisions had to be made.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Crookes (1989) reported a complexity effect, but no significant differences for accuracy.

    “The most comparable study (Crookes, 1989) reported a complexity effect, but no significant differences for accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes, 1989 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § RESULTS

    These results contrast with those of Crookes (1989) in that here planning is associated with a greater degree of accuracy, at least some of the time.

    “First, these results contrast with those of Crookes (1989) in that here planning is associated with a greater degree of accuracy, at least some of the time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crookes (1989) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § CONCLUSION

    Midtask and posttask activities are important.

    “It also suggests that midtask and posttask activities are important.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The Narrative task is less effective at meeting the criterion of real-world connection.

    “In passing, it should be noted that the Narrative task is less effective at meeting this criterion of real-world connection, as there is obviously an arbitrary, detached quality to producing an imaginary story based on a set of (relatively) unrelated photographs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Ellis (1987) reported an effect of planning on accuracy, but the study focused on only one language form (the past tense) and its experimental conditions might be thought to favor accuracy.

    “Although Ellis (1987) reported such an effect, it was for a study that focused on only one language form (the past tense, so that no complexity dimension was involved) and for which the experimental conditions (talking, alone, into a tape recorder) might be thought to favor accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ellis (1987) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The contrast in findings may be due to the nature of the measures used.

    “First of all, the contrast in findings may be due to the nature of the measures used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § (Received 25 August 1995) NOTES

    Before the study proper began, candidate tasks were piloted at a neighboring college to determine for each of the three types which task was the most productive of language and the most enjoyable to do.

    “Before the study proper began, a number ol candidate tasks were piloted at a neighboring college in order to determine for each of the three types which task was the most productive of language and the most enjoyable to do.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
93 of 93
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    If there was a practice effect of consistent strength over the three visits of the study, the Personal Information Exchange task, always completed in the second week, would be affected to the same degree as the averaged performance on the other two tasks.

    “It was assumed that if there was a practice effect of consistent strength over the three visits of the study, the Personal Information Exchange task, always completed in the second week, would be affected to the same degree as the averaged performance on the other two tasks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Attention is limited in capacity and its use to achieve one goal can reduce the capacity remaining for the achievement of other goals.

    “The general perspective in this article is that attention is limited in capacity and that its use to achieve one goal can reduce the capacity remaining for the achievement of other goals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The tasks were closely based on types commonly used in classrooms.

    “This was unproblematic, as each of the tasks was closely based on types commonly used in classrooms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The three tasks used are valid representatives of the Personal, Narrative, and Decision task types.

    “These three tasks were chosen because they vary the importance of background knowledge and general familiarity, on the one hand, and inherent structure, on the other.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The measures of complexity, accuracy, and fluency used validly capture those constructs.

    “the present study used a more global measure based on all contributory influences on error and correctness”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The planning conditions (no planning, undetailed, detailed) successfully manipulated planning time and cognitive load as intended.

    “detailed planning causes subjects to structure their subsequent task contributions in a more ambitious manner”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The subjects' reactions (Narrative task most difficult) reflect actual cognitive difficulty.

    “a proposal consistent with the reactions of the subjects, who thought the Narrative task most difficult but produced the most complex language while doing it”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ways in which information is distributed among learners, and the ways in which they must exchange information can impact learner interaction.

    “The ways in which information is distributed among learners, and the ways in which they must exchange information can impact learner interaction (Doughty & Pica 1986;Foster & Skehan 1996;Ellis 2003;Pica et al. 2006;Gilabert, Barón & Llanes 2009).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Foster & Skehan 1996

    The task-analysis discussion (section labeled “Thames Valley University”; page unavailable) says that task design can affect negotiation of meaning and other features of conversational interaction. The Tasks section describes learners exchanging information in dyads, but the available passages do not specifically establish that how information is distributed among learners, or how they are required to exchange it, affects interaction. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The choice to use accuracy as a reflection of focus on form might have been too conservative to get a full insight into the effects of task repetition.

    “Second, our choice to use 'accuracy as a reflection to focus on form' (Foster & Skehan, 1996, p. 280) might have been too conservative to get a full insight into the effects of task repetition.”

    From Focus on form through task repetition in TBLT (2016) · cites this paper as Foster & Skehan, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Norusis, 1990, SPSS PC user's manual, Version 4
  2. Plough, 1993, Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice, 35
  3. Harrison, 1986, Innovations in language testing, 72
  4. Alvarez-Ossario, 1996, The effect of planning in L2 Spanish narratives
  5. Willis, 1988, Collins COBUILD English Course: Book 1
  6. Skehan, 1996, The influence of post-task activities and planning on task-based performance
  7. Bygate, 1987, Speaking
  8. Long, 1989, Task, group, and task-group interaction, University of Hawaii Working Papers in English as a Second Language, 8, 1
  9. Schmidt, 1994, Deconstructing consciousness: In search of useful definitions for applied linguistics, AILA Review, 11, 11
  10. Hunt, 1966, Recent measures in syntactic development, Elementary English, 43, 732
  11. Pica, 1993, Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice, 9
  12. Duff, 1986, Talking to learn, 147
  13. Foster, 1994, Discoursal outcomes of small-group work in an EFL classroom

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
Affiliations
University of West London (GB)
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
1996-09
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
299-323
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
OpenAlex
W2001528051
Cited by
1,147
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 50
FWCI
28.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
task-based language teaching, task planning, second language performance, fluency, complexity, accuracy, task type, narrative task, decision-making tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review