The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems
Abstract
Distributed Artificial Intelligence systems, in which multiple agents interact to improve their individual performance and to enhance the systems' overall utility, are becoming an increasingly pervasive means of conceptualising a diverse range of applications. As the discipline matures, researchers are beginning to strive for the underlying theories and principles which guide the central processes of coordination and cooperation. Here agent communities are modelled using a distributed goal search formalism, and it is argued that commitments (pledges to undertake a specific course of action) and conventions (means of monitoring commitments in changing circumstances) are the foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. An analysis of existing coordination models which use concepts akin to commitments and conventions is undertaken before a new unifying framework is presented. Finally, a number of prominent coordination techniques which do not explicitly involve commitments or conventions are reformulated in these terms to demonstrate their compliance with the central hypothesis of this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind
Searle, J. R. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173452 · Cited by 4,575
Cited by
Intelligent agents: theory and practice
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888900008122 · Cited by 6,810
Self-citationOn agent-based software engineering
Jennings, N. R. (2000) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00107-1 · Cited by 1,635
Self-citationAgent theories, architectures, and languages: A survey
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-58855-8_1 · Cited by 1,363
Self-citationAutomated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges
Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A. R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M. J., & Sierra, C. (2001) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/a:1008746126376 · Cited by 1,351
Self-citationControlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions
Jennings, N. R. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00020-2 · Cited by 549
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jennings, N. R.
- Venue
- The Knowledge Engineering Review
- Publisher
- Maximum Academic Press
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 223-250
- ISSN
- 0269-8889 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8005
- OpenAlex
- W2119471769
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0269888900000205
- The paper
- Jennings, N. R. (1993). Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888900000205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.