The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions
Open accessAbstract
One reason why Distributed AI (DAI) technology has been deployed in relatively few real-size applications is that it lacks a clear and implementable model of cooperative problem solving which specifies how agents should operate and interact in complex, dynamic and unpredictable environments. As a consequence of the experience gained whilst building a number of DAI systems for industrial applications, a new principled model of cooperation has been developed. This model, called Joint Responsibility, has the notion of joint intentions at its core. It specifies pre-conditions which must be attained before collaboration can commence and prescribes how individuals should behave both when joint activity is progressing satisfactorily and also when it runs into difficulty. The theoretical model has been used to guide the implementation of a general-purpose cooperation framework and the qualitative and quantitative benefits of this implementation have been assessed through a series of comparative experiments in the real-world domain of electricity transportation management. Finally, the success of the approach of building a system with an explicit and grounded representation of cooperative problem solving is used to outline a proposal for the next generation of multi-agent systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
(1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,269
The Contract Net Protocol: High-Level Communication and Control in a Distributed Problem Solver
Smith (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1980.1675516 · Cited by 3,716
Shackle, G. L. S., & Simon, H. A. (1959) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2228083 · Cited by 3,558
Newell, A. (1982) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(82)90012-1 · Cited by 2,589
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.
Velleman, J. D., & Bratman, M. E. (1991) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185304 · Cited by 2,384
Shoham, Y. (1993) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(93)90034-9 · Cited by 2,041
Intention is choice with commitment
Cohen, P. R., & Levesque, H. J. (1990) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90055-5 · Cited by 1,860
Cited by
Intelligent agents: theory and practice
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888900008122 · Cited by 6,810
Self-citationOn agent-based software engineering
Jennings, N. R. (2000) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00107-1 · Cited by 1,635
Self-citationMethods for task allocation via agent coalition formation
Shehory, O., & Kraus, S. (1998) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00045-9 · Cited by 1,080
Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments
Kraus, S. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00025-8 · Cited by 451
Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (1999) · Applied Logic Series · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9204-8_10 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Jennings, N. R.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-240
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076064414
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 31.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00020-2
- The paper
- Jennings, N. R. (1995). Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00020-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.