The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE: What Can Heritage Language Learners Contribute?
Abstract
Although claims about explicit and implicit language knowledge are central to many debates in SLA, little research has been dedicated to measuring the two knowledge types (R. Ellis, 2004, 2005). The purpose of this study was to validate the use of the battery of tests reported in Ellis (2005) to measure implicit and explicit language knowledge. Whereas Ellis (2005) tested only second-language (L2) learners (of English), this study tested both L2 and heritage language (HL) learners (of Spanish). Results showed that test scores loaded on a two-factor model, as in Ellis (2005), thereby providing construct validity for the tests, on a population of HL learners who have little explicit knowledge by virtue of the environment in which they acquired Spanish.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study
Ellis, R. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050096 · Cited by 1,032
Consciousness-Raising and the Second Language Learner
SMITH, M. S. (1981) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/2.2.159 · Cited by 380
Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge
Ellis, N. (1993) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541449308520120 · Cited by 269
Hulstijn, J. (2002) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/0267658302sr207oa · Cited by 250
Cited by
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
Task-Based Versus Task-Supported Language Instruction: An Experimental Study
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000069 · Cited by 151
Comparing Elicited Imitation and Word Monitoring as Measures of Implicit Knowledge
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12138 · Cited by 139
Assessing second-language oral proficiency for research: The Spanish elicited imitation task
Bowden, H. W. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000443 · Cited by 90
ELICITED IMITATION TASKS AS A MEASURE OF L2 PROFICIENCY: A META-ANALYSIS
Kostromitina, M., & Plonsky, L. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000395 · Cited by 61
THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF IMPLICIT-STATISTICAL LEARNING APTITUDE TO IMPLICIT SECOND-LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE
Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. M. (2021) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000085 · Cited by 51
A meta-analysis: age and second language grammar acquisition.
Qureshi, M. A. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.06.001 · Cited by 48
Murakami, A., & Ellis, N. C. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12500 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowles, M. A.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-271
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2043247924
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 77.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
