CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF IMPLICIT-STATISTICAL LEARNING APTITUDE TO IMPLICIT SECOND-LANGUAGE KNOWLEDGE

Godfroid, Aline, Kim, Kathy MinHye·2021·Studies in Second Language Acquisition
DOI 10.1017/s0272263121000085
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study addresses the role of domain-general mechanisms in second-language learning and knowledge using an individual differences approach. We examine the predictive validity of implicit-statistical learning aptitude for implicit second-language knowledge. Participants ( n = 131) completed a battery of four aptitude measures and nine grammar tests. Structural equation modeling revealed that only the alternating serial reaction time task (a measure of implicit-statistical learning aptitude) significantly predicted learners’ performance on timed, accuracy-based language tests, but not their performance on reaction-time measures. These results inform ongoing debates about the nature of implicit knowledge in SLA: they lend support to the validity of timed, accuracy-based language tests as measures of implicit knowledge. Auditory and visual statistical learning were correlated with medium strength, while the remaining implicit-statistical learning aptitude measures were not correlated, highlighting the multicomponential nature of implicit-statistical learning aptitude and the corresponding need for a multitest approach to assess its different facets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263121000085

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implicit aptitude may be a multicomponential construct.

    “In other words, implicit aptitude may be a multicomponential construct (Godfroid & Kim, 2021;Granena, 2020;Li & DeKeyser, 2021).”

    From Aptitude for Explicit and Implicit Learning (2024) · cites this paper as Godfroid & Kim, 2021

  • A lack of correlation between assumed measures of implicit aptitude has been reported in several recent studies.

    “Indeed, a lack of correlation between assumed measures of implicit aptitude has been reported in several recent studies (Buffington et al., 2021;Godfroid & Kim, 2021;Li & Qian, 2021).”

    From Aptitude for Explicit and Implicit Learning (2024) · cites this paper as Godfroid & Kim, 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Godfroid, 2020, Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A research synthesis and methodological guide
  2. 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.007 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.029 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/applin/amu072 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/tops.12364 · DOI
  6. Godfroid, 2018, Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A research synthesis and methodological guide
  7. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0058 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S0272263114000850 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0272263115000455 · DOI
  11. Kim, 2019, Should we listen or read? Modality effects in implicit and explicit knowledge, The Modern Language Journal, 103, 648, 10.1111/modl.12583 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158812 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/lang.12011 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.001 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011555 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006 · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S1366728912000715 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/lang.12138 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.011 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kaller, 2016, Assessing planning ability across the adult life span: Population-representative and age-adjusted reliability estimates for the Tower of London (TOL-F), Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31, 148
  21. 10.1093/applin/amu054 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/lang.12236 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1017/S0272263107070052 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/S0272263116000036 · DOI
  28. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0047 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/modl.12331 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/lang.12241 · DOI
  31. 10.1017/S0142716418000036 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/lang.12405 · DOI
  33. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0059 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.011 · DOI
  35. Core Team, 2018, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  36. Buffington, 2018, Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the cognitive science society, 1420
  37. Pili-Moss, 2019, Contributions of declarative and procedural memory to accuracy and automatization during second language practice, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 1
  38. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1037/h0087450 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1111/tops.12332 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.3758/s13428-016-0719-z · DOI
  43. 10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y · DOI
  44. 10.3758/s13421-012-0262-9 · DOI
  45. 10.21832/9781847691767-004 · DOI
  46. 10.1037/bul0000210 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x · DOI
  48. 10.1017/S0142716412000586 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1017/S0272263113000041 · DOI
  50. 10.1017/S0272263118000141 · DOI
  51. 10.1017/S0272263110000756 · DOI
  52. 10.1177/0267658316684903 · DOI
  53. 10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.634 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1111/tops.12438 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/lang.12018 · DOI
  56. 10.1017/S0272263115000510 · DOI
  57. Reber, 2015, Implicit and explicit learning of languages
  58. Shallice, 1982, Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 298, 199
  59. 10.1017/S0272263114000370 · DOI
  60. 10.4324/9780429503986-7 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1093/applin/aml001 · DOI
  62. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00626.x · DOI
  63. 10.1017/S0272263118000256 · DOI
  64. Batterink, 2019, Understanding the neural bases of implicit and statistical learning, Topics in Cognitive Science, 11, 482, 10.1111/tops.12420 · DOI
  65. 10.1017/S027226311500042X · DOI
  66. 10.31234/osf.io/94j2e · DOI
  67. 10.1111/lang.12129 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Godfroid, A., & Kim, K. M.
ORCID
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2021-05-19
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
606-634
ISSN
  • 0272-2631
  • 1470-1545
DOI
10.1017/s0272263121000085
Cited by
51
References
4
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review