Cited by 270EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge

Ellis, Nick·1993·European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

This paper reports a study of implicit and explicit learning of second language (L2) grammatical forms, the “soft”-mutations of Welsh. “Random” learners saw randomly ordered instances. “Rule” learners first learned the rules. “Rule&Instances” learners saw the rules applied to instances. Initial learning, generalisations to new words and constructions, implicit fast performance in a well-formedness RT decision task, and explicit knowledge of the rules were recorded. Analyses of over 71,000 language trials demonstrate: (1) “Random” learners quickly achieve competence on original learning material, but show little implicit learning, performing poorly on well-formedness (or “grammaticality”) judgements, and have poor acquisition of explicit knowledge of the underlying rule-structure. (2) “Rule” learners take many trials to learn the rules but this facilitates their understanding of the natural language. However, they often know rules explicitly, yet fail to apply them in practice. Explicit and implicit knowledge are doubly dissociated. (3) Initially, “Rule&Instances” learners learn slowest. However, they alone abstract a working knowledge of soft-mutations. When exposed to new constructions, they generalise and are able both to explicitly formulate the new rules and succeed on implicit well-formedness judgements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09541449308520120

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, N.
Affiliations
Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ellis, Nick
Venue
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Published
1993-09
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
289-318
ISSN
  • 0954-1446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0635
OpenAlex
W2069971109
Cited by
269
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
45.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
implicit learning, explicit knowledge, second language acquisition, rule induction, grammaticality judgment, rule knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review