TBLT AND L2 PRONUNCIATION
Open accessAbstract
Introduction to the Special Issue.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There has been a lack of research studies focusing on interaction and pronunciation; however, this lacuna is being addressed.
“Similarly, there has been a lack of research studies focusing on interaction and pronunciation; however, this lacuna is being addressed (see special issue of Studies in Second Language Acquisition Gurzynski-Weiss, Long & Solon 2017).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Gurzynski-Weiss, Long & Solon 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Task-based Language Learning and Teaching
Ellis, R. (2003) · Asian Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.65961/ajelt-2003-1-009 · Cited by 3,601 · see citing works
Schmidt, R. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.003 · Cited by 1,322 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although TBLT is not as concerned with the level of attention or awareness needed (see Leow, 1998, 2001; Schmidt, 2001; Tomlin & Villa, 1994), the belief is that learning is predicated on learners’ attending, at some level, to the target structure(s) while they are already engaged in meaningful…”
BackgroundMaturational constraints on language development.
Long, M. H. (1990) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009165 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Task‐based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings
Ellis, R. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x · Cited by 1,031 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In fact, despite recognition that the theoretical rationale for TBLT includes pronunciation (Ellis, 2009) The authors would like to thank the SSLA editors, board, and editorial assistants for their guidance on this thematic issue; the contributors for their enthusiasm for this idea from the very…”
BackgroundINPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Focus on Form in Task-based Language Teaching
Long, M. (2000) · Language Policy and Pedagogy · doi:10.1075/z.96.11lon · Cited by 440 · see citing works
INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Loewen, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050163 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks
Newton, J. (2013) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168812460814 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
3. The impact of increasing task complexity on L2 pragmatic moves
Gilabert, R., & Barón Parés, J. (2013) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.34.06ch3 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Aliaga-García, C., & Mora, J. C. (2009). Assessing the effects of phonetic training on L2 sound perception and production. In M. A. Watkins, A. S. Rauber, & B. O. Baptista (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology (pp. 2-31). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Baralt, M. (2014). Task complexity and task sequencing in traditional versus online language classes. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 95-122). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
- Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., & Robinson, P. (Eds.). (2014). Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
- Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). The effects of task type and classroom environment on learners' engagement with the language. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209-239). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
- Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 379-397.
- Elliott, A. R. (1995). Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 79, 356-371.
- Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- González-Bueno, M. (1997). The effects of formal instruction on the acquisition of Spanish stop consonants. In W. Glass & A. T. Pérez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish. Volume 2: Production, processing, and comprehension (pp. 57- 75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
- Hammerly, H. (1982). Contrastive phonology and error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 201, 17-32.
- Hansen Edwards, J. G., & Zampini, M. L. (2008). Introduction. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 1-11). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
- Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern TBLT AND L2 PRONUNCIATION 20 Language Review, 64, 459-489.
- Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99, 656-677.
- Kissling, E. M. (2013). Teaching pronunciation: Is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners? Modern Language Journal, 97, 720-744.
- Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second TBLT AND L2 PRONUNCIATION 21 language acquisition (pp. 77-99). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
- Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley.
- Long, M. H., & Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597-603). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Lord, G. (2008). Podcasting communities and second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 364-379.
- Lord, G. (2010). The combined effects of immersion and instruction on second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 488-503.
- Missaglia, F. (1999) Contrastive prosody in SLA: An empirical study with adult Italian learners of German. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1, 551- 554.
- Moyer, A. (2013). Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge, UK: TBLT AND L2 PRONUNCIATION 22 Cambridge University Press.
- Nuevo, A. M., Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner-learner interaction. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 175-202). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
- Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1-32.
- Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2011). Second language task complexity: researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
- Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in TBLT AND L2 PRONUNCIATION 23 Language Teaching, 45, 161-176.
- Rodríguez-Sabater, S. (2005). Utilizing undergraduate peer teaching assistants in a speaking program in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 533-538.
- Saito, K. (2012). Effects of instruction on L2 pronunciation development: A synthesis of 15 quasi-experimental intervention studies. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 842-854.
- Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Shehadeh, A., & Coombe, C. A. (Eds.). (2012). Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
- Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Skehan, P. (Ed.). (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins. TBLT AND L2 PRONUNCIATION 24
- Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks. Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). Harlow, UK: Longman.
- Tonkyn, A. (2012). Measuring and perceiving changes in oral complexity, accuracy and fluency: Examining instructed learners' short-term gains. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 221-246). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
- Trofimovich, P., & Gatbonton, E. (2006). Repetition and focus on form in processing L2 Spanish words: Implications for pronunciation instruction. Modern Language Journal, 90, 519- 535.
- Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: a reader. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Long, A. Y., & Solon, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Guam (GU)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-05-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-224
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2611351914
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 14.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
- San Jose State University Scholar Works (San Jose State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- task-based language teaching, second language pronunciation, pronunciation teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
